<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eddyfication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eddyfication.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eddyfication.com</link>
	<description>instruction or enlightenment, especially when it is moderately fun and predominantly useless</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steve Martin&#8217;s Approach To Fan Mail by Obdulia Negrisor</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2010/06/08/steve-martins-approach-to-fan-mail/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obdulia Negrisor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=2300#comment-1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your clarification. I like to see clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marcy Lu&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your clarification. I like to see clearly <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/" rel="nofollow">Marcy Lu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slice Of Awesome by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2012/01/06/slice-of-awesome-174/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3162#comment-1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[christian mouth hugs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>christian mouth hugs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slice Of Awesome by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/12/14/slice-of-awesome-173/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3146#comment-995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you notice that they credited Kentucky with the 3 points on the score graphics?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice that they credited Kentucky with the 3 points on the score graphics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Huffington Post, Fox Nation And Media Bias by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2009/04/07/huffington-post-fox-nation-and-media-bias/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=1254#comment-994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the post Eddy. There needs to be a lot more of this kind of talk.  I would enjoy an update to this as it&#039;s a couple years after you wrote it.   I find that many, many people are aware of the right wing bias generated from Fox, unless it&#039;s from it&#039;s supporters of course.  The disturbing thing, I think, is that many people think that Fox is the ONLY biased source out there.  I find the Huffington Post to be repulsive these days, of course you wrote this a couple years ago.  Currently you&#039;ll find on Huffpo, a slew of articles that make the entire GOP candidates out to be a bunch of whack jobs, rather than focusing on the issues and solutions that they represent.  There&#039;s many misleading headlines on there now as I write this.  

This is definitely a day of big headlines with little followup.  Do the American people really care about how many divorces a candidate has had, or affairs, or headlines that claim someone to be crazy?  The ultra conservatives, yes. everyone else, hell no. That stuff get&#039;s entirely too much air time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Eddy. There needs to be a lot more of this kind of talk.  I would enjoy an update to this as it&#8217;s a couple years after you wrote it.   I find that many, many people are aware of the right wing bias generated from Fox, unless it&#8217;s from it&#8217;s supporters of course.  The disturbing thing, I think, is that many people think that Fox is the ONLY biased source out there.  I find the Huffington Post to be repulsive these days, of course you wrote this a couple years ago.  Currently you&#8217;ll find on Huffpo, a slew of articles that make the entire GOP candidates out to be a bunch of whack jobs, rather than focusing on the issues and solutions that they represent.  There&#8217;s many misleading headlines on there now as I write this.  </p>
<p>This is definitely a day of big headlines with little followup.  Do the American people really care about how many divorces a candidate has had, or affairs, or headlines that claim someone to be crazy?  The ultra conservatives, yes. everyone else, hell no. That stuff get&#8217;s entirely too much air time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Undecided About God by Josh</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/12/11/undecided-about-god/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3144#comment-978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;Steve Jobs of Religion&quot;?  Sounds a lot like the description of the antichrist....just an observation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Steve Jobs of Religion&#8221;?  Sounds a lot like the description of the antichrist&#8230;.just an observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Playboy Interview: Steven Jobs by mary</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/10/14/the-playboy-interview-steven-jobs/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3088#comment-971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary D.R






 


Today Monday. 19. 2008
All type of bras. Medical healthiness, to go braless all the time.
Bra is all about fashion wear, is a fashion disease bras. Women who go bra- free find out if they have lower rate of
Breasts cancer and heart attack backbone.
1960 the hippest poltergeist right to go braless a voice disapproval
Once considered necessary undergarment bras are Just a Fashion statement
Special cancer and heart attack backbone.
TV 7 News mass, Also Google on the Web.
This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer and heart attack backbone. If you’re rid of wear a bra
Is being the forerunner to go braless, all the three know law expression wear a bra. Young adulthood bras.
Judgments go braless healthiness occasion your breasts will finally be able to flushed said singer.
Mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study. You have to go braless all the time all bras are no good to wear.
Women have risk of wear, available say way they are going braless
Bra gives women heart attack backbone cancer. Women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and
Hippest issues five out about the government American cancer society they lieder about smoke cased of cancer at
That time also, a bra wear. Give women bra cancer also like smoke give use cancer to all use that’s why the hippest
When braless, all the time to help all women at that time, Doctor Medical director also takes memorial four cancer
Cell study of risk bra wear. Medical say also sticking to the breasts mission saying there’s absolutely nothing good
About bras, it’ completely the price of fashion disease, to be bra – free.
There high risk rather than the bra itself ‘said Doctor Hussein, he said the issue should going braless all the time.
Lest of wingman women breasts cancer. Live in a culture where women feel insecure with a breasts line
Just go bra – free.
[Year]
[Type the company name]
GOING BRALESS MEDICAL ISSE]
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]
Apr 26th, 2011]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary D.R</p>
<p>Today Monday. 19. 2008<br />
All type of bras. Medical healthiness, to go braless all the time.<br />
Bra is all about fashion wear, is a fashion disease bras. Women who go bra- free find out if they have lower rate of<br />
Breasts cancer and heart attack backbone.<br />
1960 the hippest poltergeist right to go braless a voice disapproval<br />
Once considered necessary undergarment bras are Just a Fashion statement<br />
Special cancer and heart attack backbone.<br />
TV 7 News mass, Also Google on the Web.<br />
This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer and heart attack backbone. If you’re rid of wear a bra<br />
Is being the forerunner to go braless, all the three know law expression wear a bra. Young adulthood bras.<br />
Judgments go braless healthiness occasion your breasts will finally be able to flushed said singer.<br />
Mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study. You have to go braless all the time all bras are no good to wear.<br />
Women have risk of wear, available say way they are going braless<br />
Bra gives women heart attack backbone cancer. Women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and<br />
Hippest issues five out about the government American cancer society they lieder about smoke cased of cancer at<br />
That time also, a bra wear. Give women bra cancer also like smoke give use cancer to all use that’s why the hippest<br />
When braless, all the time to help all women at that time, Doctor Medical director also takes memorial four cancer<br />
Cell study of risk bra wear. Medical say also sticking to the breasts mission saying there’s absolutely nothing good<br />
About bras, it’ completely the price of fashion disease, to be bra – free.<br />
There high risk rather than the bra itself ‘said Doctor Hussein, he said the issue should going braless all the time.<br />
Lest of wingman women breasts cancer. Live in a culture where women feel insecure with a breasts line<br />
Just go bra – free.<br />
[Year]<br />
[Type the company name]<br />
GOING BRALESS MEDICAL ISSE]<br />
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]<br />
Apr 26th, 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Playboy Interview: Steven Jobs by mary</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/10/14/the-playboy-interview-steven-jobs/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3088#comment-970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Monday. 19. 2008
All type of bras. Medical healthiness, to go braless all the time.
Bra is all about fashion wear, is a fashion disease bras. Women who go bra- free find out if they have lower rate of
Breasts cancer and heart attack backbone.
1960 the hippest poltergeist right to go braless a voice disapproval
Once considered necessary undergarment bras are Just a Fashion statement
Special cancer and heart attack backbone.
TV 7 News mass, Also Google on the Web.
This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer and heart attack backbone. If you’re rid of wear a bra
Is being the forerunner to go braless, all the three know law expression wear a bra. Young adulthood bras.
Judgments go braless healthiness occasion your breasts will finally be able to flushed said singer.
Mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study. You have to go braless all the time all bras are no good to wear.
Women have risk of wear, available say way they are going braless
Bra gives women heart attack backbone cancer. Women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and
Hippest issues five out about the government American cancer society they lieder about smoke cased of cancer at
That time also, a bra wear. Give women bra cancer also like smoke give use cancer to all use that’s why the hippest
When braless, all the time to help all women at that time, Doctor Medical director also takes memorial four cancer
Cell study of risk bra wear. Medical say also sticking to the breasts mission saying there’s absolutely nothing good
About bras, it’ completely the price of fashion disease, to be bra – free.
There high risk rather than the bra itself ‘said Doctor Hussein, he said the issue should going braless all the time.
Lest of wingman women breasts cancer. Live in a culture where women feel insecure with a breasts line
Just go bra – free.
[Year]
[Type the company name]
GOING BRALESS MEDICAL ISSE]
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]
Apr 26th, 2011]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Monday. 19. 2008<br />
All type of bras. Medical healthiness, to go braless all the time.<br />
Bra is all about fashion wear, is a fashion disease bras. Women who go bra- free find out if they have lower rate of<br />
Breasts cancer and heart attack backbone.<br />
1960 the hippest poltergeist right to go braless a voice disapproval<br />
Once considered necessary undergarment bras are Just a Fashion statement<br />
Special cancer and heart attack backbone.<br />
TV 7 News mass, Also Google on the Web.<br />
This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer and heart attack backbone. If you’re rid of wear a bra<br />
Is being the forerunner to go braless, all the three know law expression wear a bra. Young adulthood bras.<br />
Judgments go braless healthiness occasion your breasts will finally be able to flushed said singer.<br />
Mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study. You have to go braless all the time all bras are no good to wear.<br />
Women have risk of wear, available say way they are going braless<br />
Bra gives women heart attack backbone cancer. Women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and<br />
Hippest issues five out about the government American cancer society they lieder about smoke cased of cancer at<br />
That time also, a bra wear. Give women bra cancer also like smoke give use cancer to all use that’s why the hippest<br />
When braless, all the time to help all women at that time, Doctor Medical director also takes memorial four cancer<br />
Cell study of risk bra wear. Medical say also sticking to the breasts mission saying there’s absolutely nothing good<br />
About bras, it’ completely the price of fashion disease, to be bra – free.<br />
There high risk rather than the bra itself ‘said Doctor Hussein, he said the issue should going braless all the time.<br />
Lest of wingman women breasts cancer. Live in a culture where women feel insecure with a breasts line<br />
Just go bra – free.<br />
[Year]<br />
[Type the company name]<br />
GOING BRALESS MEDICAL ISSE]<br />
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]<br />
Apr 26th, 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slice Of Awesome: Hedonism Edition by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/10/14/slice-of-awesome-hedonism-edition/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3095#comment-969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my all time favs. The rippin&#039; an the tearin&#039;, the rippin&#039; an the tearin&#039;. Props to the interviewer for knowing he was filming video gold and not taking advantage of the moment to ask more questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my all time favs. The rippin&#8217; an the tearin&#8217;, the rippin&#8217; an the tearin&#8217;. Props to the interviewer for knowing he was filming video gold and not taking advantage of the moment to ask more questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unbroken by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/09/13/unbroken/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3046#comment-968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is ihe same author! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is ihe same author! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quote Of The Day by Tom</title>
		<link>http://eddyfication.com/2011/09/22/quote-of-the-day-7/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddyfication.com/?p=3060#comment-949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, Ed. I guess what is at issue is the worthiness of the contributions in the history of philosophy. But that&#039;s for another time - perhaps when you&#039;re next in Singapore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Ed. I guess what is at issue is the worthiness of the contributions in the history of philosophy. But that&#8217;s for another time &#8211; perhaps when you&#8217;re next in Singapore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

