Vacation In Retrospect

Lizzi and I returned yesterday from a week’s vacation.  Our time away was mostly spent in Phoenix and Boulder, punctuated by quick trips to Tucson and Breckenridge.  Though the comforts of home are always easily greeted, the trip was an overall joy, save for the occasional bed bug attack and gradual loss of sanity arising from endless packing and unpacking.

In Phoenix, we spent most of our time catching up with my family.  This involved plenty of eating (La Grande Orange was tops for brunch and dinner at ZuZu in the Hotel Valley Ho wasn’t too shabby), a quick trip to Tucson for a tour of the University of Arizona with my little brother (lunch at Pasco Kitchen was fantastic), a brisk hike up Piestewa Peak, and your standard moments of familial annoyance.  There was also, of course, the obligatory philosophical debate with grandma.  The impetus being that I promised to read her book on cosmic consciousness if she would promise to read my blog, which I’m pretty sure she considers heretic crap.  What followed was a revelation that grandma, ever the mystic, exists in the fourth dimension.  This makes it hard for her to communicate with spiritual infants who flounder aimlessly in 3D.  My inquiries into how she graduated to 4D and who had decision-making authority to grant her such access were met with agitation.  I therefore chose to bite my tongue and allow grandma her moment of spiritual condescension.  Though we disagree wholeheartedly on many topics, I love grandma for her verve…and for the inspiration she provides a certain atheist blogger.

We also enjoyed making fun of “the best boutique hotel” in Phoenix, The Clarendon.  The “best of” moniker is in quotations since it appears to be self-proclaimed (the “rewards” section on its website is mysteriously inoperable), kind of like how millions of coffee shops across the U.S. lay claim to the world’s best coffee.  (A visit to the hotel’s website also reminds me that I should hold in suspicion any company whose web address ends in .net)  Our stay started out strange enough.  Upon entering the lobby (situated more as a hallway entrance), I was immediately overcome by the feeling of shadiness.  It’s hard to describe why but let’s just say that I wouldn’t be surprised if there were multiple drug deals going down in the dark recesses of the hotel’s general areas.  Though plenty friendly, the lady behind the counter spent an inordinate period of time explaining to us the very basic rules of hotel-staying.  (“Yes, we’re well aware of all that, this not being our first rodeo.”)  And she was infused with a special sense of pride given her role as keeper of the snacks (these were free, she’d have us know, several times over).  She also made us aware that those snacks would for the evening be delivered by her teenage daughter, who clearly had nothing better to do over her winter break than to accompany her mother on the graveyard shift.  This was as depressing as it was strange.

Once in our room, we were entertained by the overbearing scent of cheap air freshener, the blaring of an alarm from across the hall that was apparently set for 10 PM everyday, and a woeful attempt at art house decor.  The bathroom was impossibly small, a situation made funnier by the fact that the faucet would only run cold unless the shower was turned on hot at the same time.  On our trips to the elevator we had plenty of time to observe the pool scene since the elevator took twelve minutes to navigate four floors.  The pool was set at the bottom of the hotel’s open air atrium, giving the place a seedy motel feel.  This picture was made complete by the invariable sight of a floating, mustachioed man made buoyant by generous amounts of excess fat…nursing a beer…at 9:30 in the morning.  On vacation, this is an acceptable – if not encouraged – move.  But it was being executed with a level of nonchalance indicative of standard procedure rather than occasional indulgence.  The image of this man perfectly encapsulates the Clarendon experience, not to mention the bed bug attack that Lizzi is pretty sure occurred during the final night of our stay.

Once in Boulder, we were granted a reprieve in both company and accommodation.  Comfortably ensconced in the tasteful St. Julien Hotel, we spent most of our stay getting caught up with some very dear friends, two of whom were in town from Sydney and one of whom now calls the Denver area home.  The former group represents for us the highlight of our Tokyo stay while the latter gentleman is among the funniest people I know.  He’s the kind of guy who routinely turns otherwise problematic situations into cause for uproarious laughter.  For example, having recently encountered some problems with Lasik surgery, he greets the staff upon his (many) follow-up trips to the eye clinic by playfully pointing out the nurse “responsible” for the mishap (“There she is!  That’s the one!”, delivered with a shit-eating grin in a manner designed to exact maximum discomfort).  He then proceeds to read a very clear and very large letter “P” during the eye exam as a “4″.  Perplexed, the nurse explains that he should be seeing letters.  To this my friend replies, “Then why are you putting numbers up there?!”.

Boulder is a great little spot, boasting lots of cool shops and great restaurants (I recommend Salt and Kitchen).  Being a college town, it’s a blue dot in the middle of a red state.  It had a sort of Bohemian vibe to it, reminding me slightly of Berkeley.  Notwithstanding my fiscal conservatism, I feel awfully comfortable in these towns.  I even find the preponderance of street performers and beggars charming.  One young lady had the word “love” partially spelled out with loose change and would ask passers-by if they’d help her make love on the sidewalk.  I found this clever, which suggests to me that my socially liberal tendencies win out in the end.  Or maybe I’m just open-minded and intellectually flexible, as evidenced by my willingness to visit Lefthand Books and leaf through literature celebrating Che, anarchism, and collectivism.  Of course, I also chuckled at the notion that the store exists through the efforts of volunteers that are ironically in short supply (judging by various announcements on its website and doorway).

We left Boulder for a day-and-a-half to hit the slopes in Breckenridge, about a 90-minute drive west.  Thanks to some pretty heavy snowfall during the drive out, our journey was a rather precarious one that left me thankful we opted for the Subaru Outback as our rental.  Given the poorly marked roads, mountainside curves, and absence of artificial lighting, I wouldn’t be surprised if Colorado leads the U.S. in highway fatalities.  Having left in the early afternoon, we made it to Breckenridge with just enough time to catch about an hour’s worth of skiing.  This being my first time on skis, I acquitted myself rather well and managed to feel moderately comfortable by hour’s end.  This gave me a false sense of confidence heading into the next morning when I felt compelled to follow our group of advanced-skier friends along the Blue route to meet up with some other friends at One Ski Hill on Peak 8 (we were coming from the Hyatt on Peak 9).  I somehow managed to survive the trek though not without the occasional face plant.  One wipeout was particularly good, falling just short of a full yardsale (I learned that this is ski slang for a crash involving the loss of both skis, poles, goggles, gloves, and hat).  On this particular fall, I managed to shed both skis along with my pride.  For some reason, my instincts force me to always cut left when attempting to stop (a technique I picked up while watching skiing on television).  This is perhaps because I’m right-handed and therefore have more confidence in my right foot/leg serving as the brake.  I happened to arrive at this attempted stop at what I perceived as being breakneck speed, a term for which I’ve developed a newfound appreciation.  Upon cutting to my usual left, I immediately lost the plot.  My body’s momentum kept going downhill while my feet tried to stay planted at an angle.  Physics being what they are, my feet lost that battle, which caused me to somersault uncontrollably a solid 15-20 feet as my skis quickly departed from my boots.  My head snapped back pretty violently when I hit the ground (thank you, helmet) and I was certain that I bit off the front half of my tongue (luckily that was not the case).  As fate would have it, this all occurred in front of our friends, all of whom were parked at the bottom of the hill graciously waiting for the idiot beginner in the group to catch up.  I figured the least I could do was reward their patience with a first-rate wipeout.

I left Breckenridge with only a moderate appreciation for skiing.  It is plenty fun as an activity but the build-up is draining.  First, you spend lots of money on gear (gloves, goggles, coat, pants, socks, long underwear, hat, etc.).  Then you pack all that gear into an overstuffed bag and head for the airport.  Then you drive a couple hours from the airport to the resort.  Then you spend more money renting skis, boots, helmets, etc.  Then you spend fifteen minutes putting on all that gear.  Then you waddle out to the nearest ticket office and spend silly money for a day pass.  Then you find the nearest gondola, which takes you ten minutes up the hill where you then wait in line for another ski lift to take you to some such run or another.  When you’re finally at the top, you spend a few minutes actually skiing before waiting another 10-15 minutes in line for another lift that will take you 10 minutes up the hill again for another 3-5 minutes worth of skiing.  For me, I didn’t derive enough utility out of the skiing itself to justify the premium spent in time and money.  I’m told the above frustrations are a function of choosing a popular destination like Breckenridge.  In which case, I look forward to visiting a less cumbersome spot in the future.  For her part, Lizzi did great and managed to escape the mountains with nary a spill.  And I’m pretty sure she got a kick out of my wipeouts, so I suspect her experience was more of a net positive.

I got a fair amount of reading done over the break.  On our flight out to Phoenix, I read “Farther Away“, Jonathan Franzen’s fantastic contribution to the New Yorker from last April.  In it, Franzen remembers his old friend, David Foster Wallace, while ruminating on Robinson Crusoe and the concept of solitude during a trek to one of the world’s most remote islands.  This notion of distraction-free individuality providing fertile ground for creativity has long been espoused by Franzen, whose collection of personal essays is entitled How To Be Alone and whose rules for writing include “It’s doubtful that anyone with an internet connection at his workplace is writing good fiction.”  It just so happens that my Sunday NY Times greeted my return with an OpEd written by Susan Cain about the “Rise of the New Groupthink“.  Among other things, the article talks about how people are more creative when they are alone and free from interruption, that “solitude is a catalyst to innovation” and that “we’re often so dazzled by charisma that we overlook the quiet part of the creative process.”  So the fact that I usually blog with the television on, music in the background, and dozens of open web pages probably explains why my writing is such shit.

Despite my mediocrity, I intend to write a book this year, so the above resonates with me as I attempt to crystallize my own thoughts on the creative process.  Seeking inspiration during our trip, I sequestered myself away in the Boulder Bookstore for a couple of hours one day.  I spent my time there reading snippets of Franzen, Wallace, Salinger, Bolano, Pynchon, Fitzgerald, Heller, Mitchell, and Klosterman.  An eclectic collection of voices, I was looking for help in understanding tone and rhythm, whether in essay or novel form.  I was also secretly hoping that surrounding myself with such genius would somehow imbue me with magical abilities of my own.  But instead of becoming more learned and inspired, I left feeling somewhat defeated.  Reading the work of these brilliant writers brought about a wave of insecurity in my own abilities.  How could I possibly have anything to add to a world already gifted with such talent?  This feeling of desperation lasted about an hour before I convinced myself that what I just did was akin to an aspiring singer listening to Ray LaMontagne or Aretha Franklin and deciding to pack it in.  When instead they should be looking to Brittany Spears as inspiration.  If the entertainment industry has taught us anything, it’s that mediocrity is often handsomely rewarded.  For every Louis C.K., there’s a Dane Cook.  For every Conan O’Brien, there’s a George Lopez.  For every Bill Clinton, there’s a Barack Obama.  (Zing!)

While perusing the bookshelves I came across the author George Saunders, about whom I vaguely recall hearing in the past.  I picked up The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil and read it on the flight back to Chicago, along with a couple of chapters from his collected essays, The Braindead Megaphone.  Phil was fun as a quirky, Vonnegutesque form of social commentary.  But I’m enjoying more his collection of essays.  The first story in Braindead is where the book takes its name.  It’s a brilliant treatise on today’s media and echoes many of my own sentiments on the topic (save for the leftward lean).  This is something I’ve blogged about in the past and come increasingly close to doing again with each viewing of those sanctimonious “Lean Forward” ads on MSNBC.

But if we define Megaphone as the composite of hundreds of voices we hear each day that come to us from people we don’t know, via high-tech sources, it’s clear that a significant and ascendant component of that voice has become bottom-dwelling, shrill, incurious, ranting, and agenda-driven.  It strives to antagonize us, make us feel anxious, ineffective, and alone; convince us that the world is full of enemies and of people stupider and less agreeable than ourselves…

In a time of danger, the person sounding the paranoid continual alarm will eventually be right.  A voice arguing for our complete rightness and the complete wrongness of our enemies, a voice constantly broadening the definition of ‘enemy’, relieves us of the burden of living with ambiguity.

I also managed to read some of Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals, which did its part in keeping me on the road towards a plant-based diet. By the way, I had a partner in all this reading, as Lizzi could be spotted at any given time curled up with her Kindle devouring The Hunger Games trilogy.

So here I sit, the evening before my return to the office, feeling less stoked than usual about getting back to work after a long break.  Unless there’s a huge market for mediocre writing out there, this better be a fleeting feeling.

Quote Of The Day

From Francisco’s “Money Speech” in the Ayn Rand classic, Atlas Shrugged.  Apropos to the moment:

When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed.

On The Grinds Of Travel And The Delights Of Home

Having spent the better part of three weeks on the road (in London, Hong Kong, and Singapore), I returned yesterday to the delights of home.  My journey home from Singapore followed a great Friday night out with friends that included dinner at Luke’s Oyster Bar and Chop House and drinks at some bar on Club Street whose primary differentiating feature was a wall full of random mix tapes.  After toying with the notion of playing through until my 4 AM departure for the airport, I decided instead to head back to the hotel for a power nap at around 1 AM.  I awoke at 3:30 AM to groggily begin my 20+ hour journey home.

After being asked to show my boarding pass on (literally) six different occasions while making my way to the gate at Changi, our United 747 pushed back at 6 AM and we were touching down in Hong Kong for our connection to Chicago about 3.5 hours of interrupted sleep later (being seated next to the galley is the kiss of death for the road-weary traveler).  Our layover was theoretically scheduled for a very manageable two hours.  However, once we boarded, we found ourselves sitting at the gate well past our scheduled push-back time.  Turns out the flight was being held up for a connecting passenger.  I can understand why this should happen (putting myself in the shoes of that wayward traveler); however, as our delay worked on the one-hour mark, I became rather perturbed.  If we were waiting for a group of travelers, that’s one thing.  But the announcements made it sound like we were being held up for just one person.  I looked it up and this particular flight (on a Boeing 747-400) had a seating capacity of 374.  And since this was a sold out flight, 373 eager passengers – many of whom were due to connect to myriad flights of their own upon reaching Chicago – were being held up by just one individual.  I’m not sure how these decisions are made by the airlines – and I appreciate the difficulty of managing such complex systems – but this particular practice could surely use a revisit.  Especially since the passenger in question never even arrived, causing our flight to be further delayed as the person’s bags were removed!

Once airborne, I used the 14.5 hour flight to take in a movie (the predictably mediocre Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides), sleep intermittently for about eight hours (this flight was an especially bumpy one), read Haruki Murakami’s What I Talk About When I Talk About Running (which provided motivation for my upcoming marathon as well as fuel my dreams of becoming a writer someday), and watch a couple episodes of MTV’s Challenge: Rivals (one of the greatest reality franchises around).  I finally arrived in Chicago around 3 PM on Saturday and was greeted by my two ladies who happily drove me home with the moonroof open on a gorgeous Fall day.  Once home, I flirted with the idea of a run only to succumb to the comforts of the man cave, where I happily took in a much-need Irish victory over Michigan State.  I then caught up on Curb Your Enthusiasm (this season is superb) before drifting off to sleep to the sounds of the Florida State-Oklahoma game.  Bliss.

I awoke this morning around 6 AM to the beeping of our carbon monoxide alarm (no worries, just a unit error), which was fine since I’m jet-lagged anyway.  I relaxed with a coffee, bagel, the news, and Sportscenter before nailing a 13-miler at a 7 minute 37 second per mile clip.  These past few weeks have surely set my training back.  But the clip on this morning’s run was my second-best and I felt pretty good doing it, so I have no idea what to make of anything when it comes to all this training stuff.

I just watched Manchester United lay waste to Chelsea (thanks in large part to some monumental brain farts by Fernando Torres).  And now I’ll saddle up with a collection of newspapers and magazines that have piled up in my absence while watching the Bears game.  Following that, I’ll saunter on down to the Houndstooth Saloon, which is a mere two blocks away and just so happens to be a Dallas Cowboys bar.  While I typically don’t advocate day-drinking or drinking on Sundays, I will make an exception today because it just feels like the right thing to do.  Ah, the delights of being home!

Unbroken

I’ve just finished devouring one of the most fascinating books that I’ve ever read.  Unbroken – written by Seabiscuit author Laura Hillenbrand – tells the story of Louis Zamperini, a world-class runner turned World War II bombardier who is definitely one of the toughest bastards our country has ever produced.  Among many other things, the dude survived a B-24 crash into the Pacific Ocean, 47 days adrift at sea, and more than two years of torture at the hands of some rather sadistic Japanese captors.  Anyone interested in an inspirational story of super-human fortitude and perseverance that is superbly researched and written is highly advised to give this book a go.  Mr. Zamperini is the quintessential personification of our country’s greatest generation, a man whose unfathomable strength and courage are examples for us all.  I will take this story with me for a long while, for it is a reminder of how trifling are my daily travails and how thankful I am for those who risk everything to serve our country.

Sunday in Singapore

Having wrapped up another week of class, I’m left with a sandwich Sunday since I’ve got meetings in town on Monday and Tuesday.  These days are a welcome break in the routine, as they give me a day to relax, read, and blog about nothing in particular.

The elevators in my hotel are those fancy schmancy ones that have little television screens built into the panels above the buttons.  Playing on those screens this morning was a Charlie Rose interview with funnyman Zach Galifianakis.  I was tempted to ride the elevator up and down for 20 minutes to watch the entire chat but figured that would be poor form.  So instead I hustled to my room to watch the interview on the interwebs.  The clip was pretty good (you can watch it here) and it reminded me of three things.  One, Charlie Rose has a cool job and I dare say he’s pretty good at it.  Two, I always enjoy seeing comedians/actors who normally play outlandish characters exist for a brief moment as normal human beings.  And three, Seth Macfarlane had a great Tweet the other day where he wondered what lurks in the eerie black void behind Rose.  I wish someone would ask him about that backdrop and he would respond by staring at them in silence for an awkward period of time before turning around and disappearing into the blackness.

Speaking of watching stuff, I’ve got Friday’s Real Time with Bill Maher on as I type this and it might be his worst one yet.  His collection of guests this week left much to be desired:  Al Sharpton, John Legend, Markos Moulitsas (of Daily Kos fame), Dana Loesch (a radio host), and Dan Neil of the Wall Street Journal (to talk about electric cars).  The guests had nothing much to add and made mostly obvious or asinine comments (particularly in the case of Legend and Moulitsas).  And Maher’s show-ending “New Rules” monologue about Brett Favre was just weird.  It got off to a good start but quickly devolved into a weird self-hating diatribe about how white men are idiots who ruin everything.  The Favre “sexts” are certainly fodder for good fun but this was one big swing and a miss for Maher.

Moving on – Once the torrential downpours subsided (which occur with great frequency here), I decided to brave the crowds and roam Orchard Road.  The primary shopping area of Singapore, I’m convinced that each of the country’s five million residents pays a visit to Orchard over the weekend.  It might be the most annoyingly packed place on the planet, filled with hordes of window-shoppers and Filipino maids enjoying their day off (congregations similar to those seen in Hong Kong’s Central district on Sundays).  I wonder if the Singaporean government has mandated that patriotism equals one trip per week to the country’s magnificent mile equivalent.  In which case I’d say Singapore is a mighty patriotic place indeed.

I paid a visit to the local Borders bookstore to see if I could find Jonathan Franzen’s latest work, Freedom.  Though I’m not entirely sold on the guy, I’ve got a friend with impeccable taste who swears by him.  Plus, I saw him do a BBC interview the other day and he seemed pretty smart.  I like feeling smart, so reading him is probably a good thing.  And though I own an iPad – which allows for plenty of book downloads for the avid traveler – a Franzen work strikes me as one that needs to be owned in hard copy.  That way people who peruse my bookshelf at home will assume I’m one of the sharper tools in the shed.  It’s the literary equivalent of wearing glasses.

Interestingly, though, I detected not a whiff of Franzen at the store.  Given all the media hype, I figured he’d be prominently displayed among the “Staff Favorites” or “Bestsellers”.  Instead, he was nowhere to be found.  Not even when I visited the Fiction section and looked him up by name.  There were lots of books by Jodi Picoult but not a damn thing by Franzen.

One topic on prominent display, though, was Singapore.  I’ve heard from expat friends here that the Singaporeans are a rather proud people.  And a visit to a local bookstore does nothing to dispel that notion.  Indeed, a whole wall was dedicated to the city-state, with a host of works chronicling the country’s miraculous rise.  Titles like From Third World To First and The Singapore Story were all over the place.  But the one that stood out to me was Conversations with Lee Kuan Yew: How To Build A Nation.  There is so much inherently interesting about that title, particularly the notion that one could actually build a nation in modern times (which is pretty much what Lee Kuan Yew has done).  This resonated with me not only because it provided an awestruck moment of “Well, he would know”, but it also got me thinking about how more people should do that – and by that I mean they should found their own country.  As we know, there’s precedence.  And it appears there’s funding too.  This may or may not have stemmed from a brainstorm I shared with some B-school classmates.  And our latest brainstorm may or may not involve channeling L. Ron Hubbard and founding our own religion.  We don’t do small ideas at Booth.

 

Share

Is This Banana Indian?

As I sat eating a banana this morning, I found myself wondering where it came from.  (You can chalk such rumination up to extreme geekness or charming curiosity.)  As I’m in Singapore at the moment, I immediately assumed India since, you know, it’s the world’s largest producer of bananas – by a long shot.  That’s just one of a handful of little factoids that I recall from Dan Koeppel’s book, Banana: The Fate of the Fruit That Changed the World.  Though slightly underdone, I found the book an interesting one, particularly the part that traces the fruit’s evolution as a moneymaker and empire builder.  I suppose the whole notion of a “banana republic” should be a dead giveaway, but who knew that one of the world’s most ubiquitous fruits could play such an interesting role in global development and politics!?

Share

Managing Expectations

I love the way actor Michael Caine describes his new memoir, The Elephant to Hollywood:

It won’t be a great literary effort.  It’ll be for guys.

Share

Capitalism 4.0

I read one of the more interesting economically-oriented OpEds in quite some time the other day.  In a recent NY Times piece, economist Anatole Kaletsky described the new world order that arose following the 2008 financial crisis and how it marks the ushering in of an economical model that will see private enterprise and government grow increasingly intertwined.  Though my knee-jerk reaction is to recoil in horror at his underlying thesis, Kaletsky (I’m afraid) makes a rather convincing argument.

Market fundamentalists who feel that government interference with free markets is anathema should be reminded that, by today’s dogmatic standards, Ronald Reagan is one of the great manipulators of all time. He presided over two of the biggest currency interventions in history: the Plaza agreement, which devalued the dollar in 1985, and theLouvre accord of 1987, which brought this devaluation to an end.

The fact is that the rules of global capitalism have changed irrevocably since Lehman Brothers collapsed two years ago — and if the United States refuses to accept this, it will find its global leadership slipping away. The near collapse of the financial system was an “Emperor’s New Clothes” moment of revelation.

In this climate, the market fundamentalism now represented by the Tea Party, based on instinctive aversion to government and a faith that “the market is always right,” is a global laughingstock. Yet more moderate figures from both parties largely hold the same view…Outside America, however, a strong conviction now exists that some new version of global capitalism must evolve to replace what the economist John Williamson coined the “Washington consensus.”

For those interested in learning more, Kaletsky is the author of a book called Capitalism 4.0, which basically takes a look at capitalism’s historical arch and explains how the next step in its evolution will see a cozier and more overt public-private partnership (clearly a nod to a certain rising power in Asia).  I’m certainly not yet willing to crown China’s economic model a rousing success – to be sure, it’s got a long ways to go – but I must say that Kaletsky gives us free market ideologues plenty to chew on.

Share

Thom Yorke Won’t Let Me Study

I woke up this morning humming the tune of Radiohead’s “Sulk”.  I have no idea how the song got in my head.  All I know it that it’s from the band’s very splendid album The Bends, which I haven’t listened to in months.  So as I pondered which background music would accompany my afternoon of studying (I’ve got yet another securities exam on Wednesday), I decided to stick with the day’s theme and give Radiohead’s incomparable Kid A another listen.  I figured the album’s dark undertones would perfectly complement my mood.  And why not listen to one of the greatest albums of the last decade while incurring yet more finance-related brain damage?

As is often the case, I was easily distracted during my Yorke-inspired study session, and my first daydream was sparked while taking in the song “How To Completely Disappear” (sadly, that’s track number four on the album, so I didn’t make it far before getting sidetracked).  This song is one of the more hauntingly beautiful tunes I’ve ever heard.  And every time I give it a listen, I’m strangely yet inevitably overcome by the unsettling thought that this would be precisely the song that I would play if I ever decided to kill myself.  Yeah, I know.  That’s pretty weird.  But it’s exactly what I think about each time I hear it.  I just can’t help my twisted self!

Naturally, this got me thinking about the entire album and how brilliantly manic it is.  Which, of course, led me to another tangent, this time recalling Chuck Klosterman’s crazy-but-super-cool theory about how Thom Yorke may have managed to predict the attacks of September 11th with Kid A.  For those curious about the theory, or simply interested in some great writing about all things music and pop culture, I highly recommend that you give his book Killing Yourself To Live a read.  For those not so keen, here’s a taste of where he went with his theory in the book:

The first song on Kid A paints the Manhattan skyline at 8:00 A.M. on Tuesday morning; the song is titled “Everything in Its Right Place.” People woke up that day “sucking on a lemon,” because that’s what life normally feels like on the Manhattan subway; the city is a beautiful, sour, sarcastic place. We soon move onto song two, which is the title track. It is the sound of woozy, ephemeral normalcy. It is the sound of Jonny Greenwood playing an Ondes Martenot, an instrument best remembered for its use in the Star Trek theme song. You can imagine humans walking to work, riding elevators, getting off the C train and the 3 train, and thinking about a future that will be a lot like the present, only better. The term KID A is Yorke’s moniker for the first cloned human, which he (only half jokingly) suspects may already exist. The consciously misguided message is this: Science is the answer. Technology solves everything, because technology is invulnerable. And this is what almost everyone in America thought around 8:30 A.M. But something happens three and a half minutes into “Kid A”. It suddenly doesn’t feel right, and you don’t exactly know why. This is followed by track three, “The National Anthem”

This is when the first plane slams into the north tower at 470 mph.

“The National Anthem” sounds a bit like a Morphine song. It’s a completley different direction from the first two songs on KID A, and it’s confusing; it’s chaotic. “What’s going on?,” the lyrics ask. “What’s going on?” It gets crazier and crazier, until the second plane hits the second tower (at 9:03 A.M. in reality and at 3:42 in the song). For a moment, things are somber. But then it gets more anarchic. (Reader’s Note: You might want to consider playing KID A right about now, since I’m not always so good at explaining shit like this). Which leads into track four, “How to Disappear Completely.” This is the point where it feels like the world is possibly ending. People try to convince themselves that they are not there. People keep repeating: “This isn’t happening”. People are “floating” (read: falling) to the earth. We are told of strobe lights and blown speakers; there are fireworks and hurricanes. This is a song about being burned alive and jumping out of windows, and this is a song about having to watch those things happen. And it’s followed by an instrumental piece without melody (“Treefingers”), because what can you say when skyscrapers collapse? All you can do is stare at them with your hand over your mouth.

Time passes. It’s afternoon. KID A’s side two, if you have it on vinyl. Action is replaced by thought. The song is “Optimistic, ” a word that becomes more meaningful in its absence. It has lyrics about Ground Zero (“vultures circle the dead”), and it offers a glimpse into how Al Qaeda members think Americans perceive international diplomacy (“the big fish eat the little ones, the big fish eat the little ones/Not my problem, give me some”). Track seven, “In Limbo” is about how the United States has been shaken out of its fantasy, with “nowhere to hide,” finding only “trap doors that open, I spiral down”……

Pretty crazy/cool/weird, eh?  This is the type of stuff that I’d rather have occupy my mind.  Not the various methods used to benchmark the performance of private equity funds.  By the way, speaking of the song “Optimistic”, it’s got a really cool ending.  I love songs whose endings either turn super intense or go off on random but totally awesome tangents.  The grandest example of this is the piano exit of Derek and the Dominos’ Layla, used to perfection by Martin Scorsese in Goodfellas.  Beyond “Optimistic”, Radiohead has a couple more gems of this genre, including the aforementioned “Sulk” as well as “Black Star” and “Fake Plastic Trees”.

Ugh…I could go on but the fun must end here.  Having tackled the nuances of private equity, the agenda now calls for a visit to the wild world of commodities.  And away…we…go.

Share

Traveling Light

Traveling can be a cathartic experience.  Particularly if you’re like me and incapable of doing anything responsible while in transit.  Unlike most of my fellow commuters, I’m incapable of engaging in productive activity while on planes or trains.  Catching up on offline email?  No thanks.  Studying for my upcoming exams?  Nah.  I’d rather load up on all the free rags handed out by my airline of choice, watch crappy films, and listen to my recent music downloads.  This is my time to be removed from it all – no email to respond to, no phone calls to receive, no colleagues or classmates with whom to interact.  Just me and my goodies.  And the occasional interruption by the friendly neighborhood flight attendant.

Before I boarded my flight for Hong Kong yesterday, I had an opportunity to observe two very unique Japanese phenomena.  First, the Narita Express train is quite pleasant and efficient.  For all the complaints about Narita’s ridiculous distance from the city center (with which I agree), getting there by train is a largely innocuous affair.  Second, I got to witness the persistent oblivion and/or over-done-ness of Japanese service.  As I stood in line waiting to board my flight, a lovely ANA representative made her way up and and down the line of customers with a small whiteboard on which was written the name Wai Honchuen.  Being in Japan and on my way to China, I was of course surrounded by dozens of Asian-looking people.  But who does she specifically pick out to confirm that they are not the very obvious Asian in question?  Me.  The only Western-looking dude in the line.  Is she clueless to the fact that folks named Wai Honchuen don’t typically have pale skin, blue eyes, light brown hair, and big noses?  Or is she overdoing it?  Granted, it would be hard for me to distinguish someone named Juan from Latin American or Iberian ancestry.  But I’d never mistake someone with olive skin and dark features named Giuseppe as being of Korean descent.  I suspect that if I were in the line next to us awaiting a flight to Bangkok that I’d be singled out as the Thaveesri Supatcharin seated in 47F for whom the cabin crew was searching.

Speaking of Bangkok, I didn’t detect a scintilla of concern among the faces I surveyed in the Thailand-bound line next to us.  Judging by the news images, one would be excused for mistaking Bangkok for a disaster zone.  Meanwhile, here were hundreds of very pleasant-looking people of multiple nationalities appearing not at all concerned for their future safety.  Which got me thinking about how the media loves to blow things out of proportion.  I have a friend who lives in Athens who appears to be going about life as usual despite the fire-bombing that has been reported and publicized.  I have friends who have recently been to Bangkok who have likewise downplayed the violence there.  And my time spent in Seoul has revealed a country that treats everyone’s favorite megalomaniac midget to the north with nary a second thought.  Granted, there have been outbursts of violence in the aforementioned countries that have sometimes had very tragic results, but things for the most part appear more sanguine than the mass media would have us believe.

On to my mid-air reading, which was comprised of the usual freebies.  I got to peruse the FT, WSJ, and IHT, most of which were par for the course, save for the Kristoff piece on how Gabon is Africa’s Eden.  I dig the touch of nature highlighted in his piece but can’t help but furrow my brow since Gabon is – sadly – a great example of how dysfunctional African leadership is on the whole.  Kristof, for all his dreaming, can’t run away from the unfortunate reality that Gabon’s populace is largely poor, “despite the country’s oil wealth”.  What does that mean?  The riches derived from the country’s vast natural resources have largely been siphoned off by a corrupt elite.  Indeed, the country had been subject to the dictatorial regime of one man, Omar Bongo, for 42 years prior to his death in 2009.  During his rule, Mr. Bongo managed to accumulate a net worth in excess of $500 million.  Not bad for a public servant in a country with a GDP per capita of $7,000.  And who took over following his death?  None other than his son, whose former wife appeared on a VH1 reality show called Really Rich Real Estate, which featured her trying to purchase a $25 million home in Malibu, CA.  Booyah!

I also perused Newsweek articles that were mostly forgettable as well as Time magazine’s 100 most influential list.  I can’t say that I’m all that surprised by the list of people.  What I found more interesting were the authors chosen to write about certain of the honorees.  Michael Moore on Brazil’s president Lula (last seen cavorting with the Iranian leadership)?  Perfect.  Sarah Palin on Glenn Beck?  Even better.  Ted Nugent on Sarah Palin?  Just threw up in my mouth.  George Lopez on Conan O’Brien?  Interesting (since Lopez shares a late night slot on TBS).  Banksy by Shepard Fairey?  Agreed.  The best one was Ricky Gervais by Karl Pilkington, who is slowly emerging as my favorite funnyman around.  My next skim was a Fortune magazine focus on Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.  It reminded me that I don’t like that magazine much, and also revealed Zuckerberg as much the dork I’ve long suspected (I’ve always thought his rolled up North Face fleece worn at big meetings was an obvious cry for help).

Luckily, Wired came through with an interesting piece on why “statistics should be the new grammar” in our society, stressing the need for us to master the math as we deal with a range of problems social, political, and otherwise.

Statistics is hard. But that’s not just an issue of individual understanding; it’s also becoming one of the nation’s biggest political problems. We live in a world where the thorniest policy issues increasingly boil down to arguments over what the data mean. If you don’t understand statistics, you don’t know what’s going on — and you can’t tell when you’re being lied to. Statistics should now be a core part of general education. You shouldn’t finish high school without understanding it reasonably well — as well, say, as you can compose an essay.

On a related note, I recently read Roger Lowenstein’s fantastic Warren Buffett biography, which – combined with an occasional peek at that wonderful Charlie Munger homage, Poor Charlie’s Almanack – drove home the importance of statistics and probability in everything Buffett does.  This brings me to another brainstorm: that infamous BP oil spill down in the Gulf of Mexico.  As can be expected, the disaster has all the usual suspects up in arms, with many reactionists calling for a total ban of all offshore drilling because of this one disaster.  Does this make any sense at all?  Well, if we put on our Buffett cap and view the world through a probabilistic prism, it most certainly doesn’t.  It’s my understanding that there are upwards of 30,000 offshore oil wells dotting the Gulf (a surprisingly large number).  And, sadly, we can now say that we’ve had one of them go awry in a major way.  For those keeping score at home, that boils down to a 1 in 30,000 chance of something like this happening.  Now consider that the U.S. relies on suspect countries like Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria for approximately 65% of its oil needs.  It strikes me as logical for us to defray those costs as much as possible by developing domestic resources of our own.  And if you told me we could do that so long as we could bear a .00003% chance of encountering a major problem in the process, I’d say that’s a pretty decent risk/reward trade-off.  But maybe that’s just me.

As I write this, I’m half-watching the daily Glenn Beck infomercial, also known as The Glenn Beck Show.  The show itself is a monumental pitch of all things Beck, with him peddling his website, paid speeches, and the show itself  (“DVR this show, tell your friends to as well, you must join me tomorrow cuz I’m gonna blow your mind!”) at every turn.  And the show’s commercials are ones you don’t often find elsewhere, with most taking on an infomercial quality: Bowflex, a varied collection of discount gold brokers, some sort of acne cream, and eDiets, just to name a few.  I’m wondering if this says more about Beck or his audience.  Either way, color me perturbed.

Enough with the procrastination.  I’m on solid ground now, which means I can no longer be excused for slacking.

Share

The Sun Sets In Phuket

Sadly, today marks our final day in Phuket.  We leave tomorrow for Singapore, where I have class and where Lizzi gets to take in another country while mingling with some of my B-school buds.   The unfortunate reality of our departure was made sweeter by the fact that I awoke to two bits of good news this morning.  First, Pete Carroll appears headed to the Seattle Seahawks, which opens the door for ND to pick off some of USC’s commits.  It could also portend a halt to Trojan dominance in the ND-USC series, an annual given with which I’ve grown immensely tired.  The second bit of good news involved the esteemed Peter King of CNNSi predicting a Super Bowl victory for the Dallas Cowboys this year.  In the immortal words of Lloyd Christmas, “Mmm….that sounds good.  I’ll have that.”

In a break from the past few days, there’s nary a cloud in sight, which allows me to look upon a wonderfully blue ocean as I sit barside “studying”.  I use parentheses because I’m very obviously not studying for the final exams I have on Monday, exams for which I feel woefully under-prepared.  Alas, it’s holiday, so I reserve the right to procrastinate.  Implications be damned!

Meanwhile, Lizzi is perched on a pool chair, devouring Dan Brown’s The Lost Symbol and exposing her porcelain skin to the sun’s laser beams.  As I mentioned in an earlier post, we are by far the whitest folks here, and Lizzi lying out like so makes me nervous for the incoming aircraft that can be easily spotted just to the south of Mai Khao beach.  I’ve got to imagine that the reflection she is creating for those poor pilots is making for quite the navigational challenge.

I’ve discovered two personal heroes during our brief stay on this little resort.  The first one is an Israeli guy, the same one I referenced in my previous post as the cigar smoker.  He’s got an interesting little family – a pretty wife (who’s Slovakian), a cute daughter, and an awkward little boy.  I just like his style…he’s got a cool way about him.  I saw him kicking a soccer ball with his daughter and it became clear quickly that he’s had some real experience with the sport.  He swam every morning before retiring to a chair for some rays and reading.  He’d enjoy a late lunch with his family, taking down some champagne and a cigar along the way.  He laughed a lot and tanned easily, two attributes that make life taste a little better.  The family left yesterday after a solid ten days here, making their way back to the cold of Vienna, Austria.  Very cool, indeed.

My other hero is a Russian guy who impresses me with his insatiable appetite.  I’ve only had occasion to observe him at breakfast, but it’s quite the sight to behold.  The man destroys food, taking down plates of bananas like pistachio nuts and pounding jars of yogurt like they’re shots of lukewarm water.  More impressive, though, is the fact that I watched him follow a feast of bread, fruit and yogurt with a solid helping of steak and eggs – and a Corona!  All at 8 AM.  Well done, sir.  Well done.

Speaking of Russians, we’ve got a lot of menacing-looking Eastern European types on our resort.  So in addition to affording me an occasional peek at a topless sunbather, it also means that our Sala crew would be in good shape if we found ourselves at war with a neighboring resort.  You never know, these things could happen.  And I’m restful in the notion that we’d be well-equipped to not only defend ourselves but to launch some pretty effective offensive maneuvers as well.  I’d try to make myself responsible for providing strategic guidance while delegating the duties of hand-to-hand combat and lifting of large objects to my Eastern European comrades.  Now that, my friends, is a recipe for success!

I’m gonna go finish my book now, er, study.  The book I’m reading is a collection of short stories called In Other Rooms, Other Wonders by the Pakistani author Daniyal Mueenuddin.  It’s a mesmerizing look into another culture, laying bare the feudalistic impulses of Pakistan while simultaneously capturing the myriad nuances that comprise the human condition.  Not only has it been heaped with critical acclaim, but I was happy to learn that one of my favorite voices, Garrison Keillor, absorbed the book during his own winter vacation, so wonderfully captured in his recent Salon piece.

Vacation cruises are advertised as luxurious journeys to exotic places, but a chief pleasure is the reading of books and another is making small talk with strangers. On steamer chairs topside or poolside, in the lounges, everywhere you see men and women with their noses in books, devouring them for hours. The Book: Man’s Chief Weapon Against Tedium. Woman’s, too. I read a book of stories by a young Pakistani writer, Daniyal Mueenuddin, and found it riveting, the most wonderful thing I’d read in a long, long time, thanks to the freedom of being at sea, away from CNN and NPR and Google, out in a vast silence in which the details of Pakistani village life loom large, as if one were actually there, sipping sweet tea with Saleema and Husad and Mr. K.K. Harouni.

I should be signing off now.  There remains work to be done before we head off to Patong Beach tonight.  It’s about an hour’s drive from our resort and is said to be the epicenter of the Phuket experience.  We’ve got a 6:30 PM dinner reservation at Baan Rim Pa, and we’ve requested a good view so I’m hoping we catch a nice shot of the sunset as we nibble on Pad Si Ew Nua and sip Phuket Beer.  Afterwards, we plan to tackle the horde of street vendors for trinkets to bring home with us, where I’m sure we’ll be able to haggle until our hearts’ delight, negotiations that will stay with us as we settle on a taxi to take us home.

The Secret Of The Secret

The below is a great post in the comments section of the Amazon.com listing of the book, The Secret.  Very funny.  h/t to Vuj for the link.

Please allow me to share with you how “The Secret” changed my life and in a very real and substantive way allowed me to overcome a severe crisis in my personal life. It is well known that the premise of “The Secret” is the science of attracting the things in life that you desire and need and in removing from your life those things that you don’t want. Before finding this book, I knew nothing of these principles, the process of positive visualization, and had actually engaged in reckless behaviors to the point of endangering my own life and wellbeing.

At age 36, I found myself in a medium security prison serving 3-5 years for destruction of government property and public intoxication. This was stiff punishment for drunkenly defecating in a mailbox but as the judge pointed out, this was my third conviction for the exact same crime. I obviously had an alcohol problem and a deep and intense disrespect for the postal system, but even more importantly I was ignoring the very fabric of our metaphysical reality and inviting destructive influences into my life.
My fourth day in prison was the first day that I was allowed in general population and while in the recreation yard I was approached by a prisoner named Marcus who calmly informed me that as a new prisoner I had been purchased by him for three packs of Winston cigarettes and 8 ounces of Pruno (prison wine). Marcus elaborated further that I could expect to be raped by him on a daily basis and that I had pretty eyes.

Needless to say, I was deeply shocked that my life had sunk to this level. Although I’ve never been homophobic I was discovering that I was very rape phobic and dismayed by my overall personal street value of roughly $15. I returned to my cell and sat very quietly, searching myself for answers on how I could improve my life and distance myself from harmful outside influences. At that point, in what I consider to be a miraculous moment, my cell mate Jim Norton informed me that he knew about the Marcus situation and that he had something that could solve my problems. He handed me a copy of “The Secret”. Normally I wouldn’t have turned to a self help book to resolve such a severe and immediate threat but I literally didn’t have any other available alternatives. I immediately opened the book and began to read.

The first few chapters deal with the essence of something called the “Law of Attraction” in which a primal universal force is available to us and can be harnessed for the betterment of our lives. The theoretical nature of the first few chapters wasn’t exactly putting me at peace. In fact, I had never meditated and had great difficulty with closing out the chaotic noises of the prison and visualizing the positive changes that I so dearly needed. It was when I reached Chapter 6 “The Secret to Relationships” that I realized how this book could help me distance myself from Marcus and his negative intentions. Starting with chapter six there was a cavity carved into the book and in that cavity was a prison shiv. This particular shiv was a toothbrush with a handle that had been repeatedly melted and ground into a razor sharp point.

The next day in the exercise yard I carried “The Secret” with me and when Marcus approached me I opened the book and stabbed him in the neck. The next eight weeks in solitary confinement provided ample time to practice positive visualization and the 16 hours per day of absolute darkness made visualization about the only thing that I actually could do. I’m not sure that everybody’s life will be changed in such a dramatic way by this book but I’m very thankful to have found it and will continue to recommend it heartily.

Back In The Saddle

After a rambunctious (and stressful) couple of weeks, I’m finally back in Tokyo and have settled back into my blogging seat.  Lizzi is away for the magical Halloween Phish event, so it’s just Hurley and me for the next week or so. By the way, Phish actually does a cool thing for its Halloween shows, when the band covers an entire album of its choosing.  If you visit its website, you’ll see a list of dozens of albums that have been whittled down one by one over the past several weeks.  As of today, there are only a few left standing, including (among others): Michael Jackson’s Thriller (a timely tribute, perhaps?), Pink Floyd’s The Wall, Led Zeppelin’s self-entitled debut album, The Stones’ Exile on Main Street, Radiohead’s Kid A, Springsteen’s Born To Run, Prince’s Purple Rain, and Elton John’s Yellowbrick Road.  Should be a fun time.

During my eight hours or so of traveling yesterday, I got to catch up on some reading and viewing entertainment:

  • Caught up on some episodes of Community on NBC.  Great show.  Here’s a fun clip to entice you.
  • Watched Adventureland.  It stars, among others, Ryan Reynolds, Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig, and it was directed by Greg Mottola, whose previous credits include Superbad and several episodes of Arrested Development and Undeclared.  This is a very good movie that I highly recommend.  It’s shameful that this hasn’t gotten more credit (only grossed $16 million at the domestic box office) and reviews appear mixed.  Nonetheless, I thoroughly enjoyed it.  The characters were great and the writing was solid, melding witty commentary with a heartfelt coming-of-age story (“Your name is James….am I saying that right?….James?” delivered with perfection by Hader).  Plus, the music was great, even the constant annoyance of Falco’s “Rock Me Amadeus”.
  • Caught some episodes of this season’s Mad Men.  This show could well go down as one of the finest shows in television history.  I’m not kidding.  I haven’t seen a show this well done since HBO’s The Wire.
  • I listened to some George Carlin and Bill Hicks stand-up comedy routines.  I love these guys.  Though Hicks goes off the deep-end with his conspiratorial nonsense, he generally has some good scathing commentary, something complemented very well with Carlin.  Denis Leary is in the same vein as these guys and I like him as well, though I know he took some flack for apparently stealing some material from Hicks.  Nonetheless, I love the tone, subject matter, delivery, etc.  Really good stuff for the less squeamish among us.
  • Lizzi got me an Amazon Kindle DX.  It’s the super-sized one that makes it easier to download newspapers and textbooks (good for me with school).  One of the great things about this little device is not only the ability to download a ton of books whenever I want, but I can store PDF files on it.  This means I can download class notes and not have to lug them around with me everywhere (which is a huge weight relief for someone on the road).  Plus, it means I can simply save interesting articles online in PDF form and then read them later on my Kindle.  This saves my eyes from the strain of the backlight and makes it cheaper for me to enjoy mags like The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, etc.
  • Among the articles I read during the flight was Malcolm Gladwell’s newest piece, which attempted to draw a parallel between our society’s obsession with American football and the disgusting “sport” of dogfighting.  While I tend to like Gladwell’s work and often can find little with which to take issue, I think he’s way off base with this one.  He’s basically saying that we, the viewing public, don’t care about the fact that NFL players put themselves at physical risk for the benefit of sport, incurring harm that sometimes results in brain impairment that takes the form of dementia or worse.  Obviously, this is a sad reality for anyone unfortunate enough to have to face it.  However, fans of dogfighting are in a league of evil all their own.  I’d be happy if each one of those morons were taken to a field somewhere and forced to fight each other for survival; this would be a justice unlike any other.  But there are several huge differences between the “sports”.  For one, NFL players actually have a choice of playing the sport whereas those poor dogs are forced to kill or be killed.  Oh yeah, that’s another difference – the sport of football does not celebrate the breaking of bones, drawing of blood or the event of death.  Rather, such events are met with gasps of horror and wishes for speedy recoveries.  And NFL players get paid millions of dollars to put themselves in harm’s way.  Those poor dogs live miserable existences and die under the worst of circumstances.  Were Gladwell to use the sport of ultimate fighting instead of football, I might at least partially see his point.  But the NFL?  In the words of Gob Bluth, come on!
  • I also read a piece about General Stanley McChrystal in the NY Times Magazine written by Dexter Filkins, whose book about Iraq and Afghanistan I quite enjoyed (The Forever War).  It’s a good, interesting piece delivered in very digestible form, a Filkins hallmark.  It helps one appreciate how hopeless our attempts over there are (if you read bewteen the lines); plus, I love reading about people like McChrystal, guys so intense and focused in their calling that you’d think they were born for exactly what they do (e.g. he sleeps five hours a night, runs 8-12 miles per day, etc.).
  • Finally, I read Bill Simmons’ NBA season preview, which was great, as always.  The guy knows his sports and he particularly excels at basketball.  He’s jokingly lobbied for a GM position in the NBA before, but I’m beginning to think that someone should take him seriously.  Not only would he bring with him millions of dedicated readers but he’d also make for a mighty fine GM.  The dude knows his stuff and, most importantly, knows when to call bullshit.  That’s a talent most modern-day GM’s seem to lack.  Were he to take over an NBA team, I’d be first in line to predict that team’s rise to the top.

Love Me Some Me

ESPN’s Rick Reilly gave a great rundown of Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson’s new book, appropriately entitled Ocho Cinco.  Anyone looking for a good laugh should give Reilly’s piece a quick read.  It provides a wonderful look into the narcissistic world people of fame sometimes inhabit.  Included among the many tongue-in-cheek reasons Reilly gives us for reading the book are:

His stirringly descriptive prose. For instance, the vivid passage in the second paragraph, in which he describes his “huge-ass house” in Florida and his seven “sweet-ass cars.” In fact, Mr. Ochocinco is able to use the word “ass” 32 times in the tome.

His seamless transitions. For instance, in a particularly tricky passage about what he’d be like if he had a show in Las Vegas (Mr. Ochocinco opines that he’d be bigger than “Penn & Teller and Céline Dion and Siegfried & Roy” combined), he writes, “Damn, I digress a lot.” And then we are whisked on our way.

His business acumen. Mr. Ochocinco plans to come out with Ocho Cinco cologne, sportswear, cigars (in a partnership with former Cuban president Fidel Castro), sunglasses, hats, clothing, shoes, cleats and condoms. He also reveals his plans to skip a post-football career in broadcasting (“too easy,” he asserts) and become an actor, a skill Mr. Ochocinco learned from watching Denzel Washington. “I should be in a Broadway show. I’m that good.”

Transcendent indeed!

Signs Of The Apocalypse

Tokyo was hit by a pretty big earthquake last night, one that measured 7.1 on the Richter Scale.  Things were shaking rather violently on our shelves and I could feel our building roll back and forth on the large stabilizers built into all modern highrises here for just this occasion.  The rumbling lasted for a solid minute and grew so intense that I actually threw on some sneakers and scooped Hurley up for a possible run down the ten flights to ground level.  Luckily, things subsided with nothing of note in the form of aftershocks.  And, in reading about the quake this morning, it appears there weren’t any injuries nor was there need for a tsunami warning.

Meanwhile, I awoke today to a torrential downpour.  In checking today’s headlines and the satellite weather map, it appears we may be receiving some spillover from the typhoon that caused China to evacuate over one million people yesterday.

As I’m in the midst of reading Robert Wright’s The Evolution of God – and am at the beginning part that highlights religion’s animistic origins – I can only assume that the gods are upset with us.  That is, after all, what most native tribes would assume.  Were I an early-day shaman, I’d run around and look for something (or someone) to sacrifice as an offering to the gods.  Or I’d call for some elaborate ceremony to ensure that it either: a) stopped raining; or b) stopping shaking.  (You’ll notice both are pretty good bets; indeed, the shaman were good at calibrating their demonstration of value-add to events that were highly likely to occur).  Or I’d blame the events on a neighboring tribe’s shaman and thus lead us to war in an effort to throw my own tribe off the scent of my chicanery.  Or perhaps we can follow the Jerry Falwell line and assume that god is punishing us for considering single-payer healthcare, or electing a Latin woman to the Supreme Court, or for electing a Kenyan to the presidency.  I’m gonna go with the Tim LaHaye crew and assume that these natural events simply portend the nearing of the end.  The end is nigh!  The end is nigh!

Chris Gardner, Cont’d.

As a follow-up to my previous post, I just did a quick search on YouTube to see if there were any good Gardner clips to support my theory.  And sure enough – I struck gold!  The below clip is great stuff.  The title alone got me all riled up: “$250,000 in my pocket and I still can’t get a f*#!ing cab!”.  There are so many wonderful takeaways from this video that I simply don’t know where to begin…

There is nothing more to be said.  Case closed.

Start Where You Are – Lessons From A Tool

37500732

A little while back, I lamented the fact that Chris Gardner, whose rags-to-riches story was wonderfully-portrayed by Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happyness, was friends with Glenn Beck.  Given my opinion of the Fox News talk show host, Gardner was immediately considered lame by association.  However, my disappointment with the man grew exponentially when I noticed that Gardner committed a massive fashion faux pas during an appearance on Beck’s show: the man was wearing two watches.

Maybe that was simply a fleeting moment of douchebaggery that should be forgiven and not, as I feared, a view of Gardner’s standard attire.  Well, he’s now got a new book out called Start Where You Are, which I’m sure is full of obvious tidbits about how one can overcome the odds with hard work and perseverance to become fabulously wealthy.  I suppose I can’t begrudge his attempt to pad his bank account with more statements of the obvious.  It’s good work if you can find it.  But what I can do is throw up all over his book’s cover, which is pictured above.  Why?  Because the man is wearing two watches.  Again.

Apparently, Gardner considers it fashionable to adorn his wrists with two fancy watches.  But fashionable it is not.  Instead, it makes painfully obvious the fact that the person sporting those watches is a narcissist obsessed with his own vanity and sense of accomplishment.  That may seem an extreme statement, but let me be clear: there is no logical reason for someone to wear two watches.  None whatsoever.  It’s like wearing more than one polo.  Or outfitting one’s mouth with gold crowns when dental hygiene doesn’t call for it.  No functional reason exists for doing these things.  The only justification for doing so is celebration of one’s self.  It’s showing off, plain and simple.

I once heard someone claim that the reason for wearing an expensive watch is because you can’t drive your Ferrari into a meeting.  In this case, shall we assume Gardner owns two Ferraris?  Maybe so.  Look, we’re all guilty of vanity to some extent, which is fine and to be expected.  I, for one, appreciate a fine watch.  And much of that appreciation derives more from its construct and look rather than its ability to keep time.  After all, how much more capable is a Patek Philippe at telling me I’m running late for a meeting than a Casio?  The reality is many of us sacrifice function for form, particularly when it comes to watches.  Otherwise, we’d all be walking around with a Timex strapped to our wrists.  At least digital watches are capable of remembering that there are less than 31 days in certain months whereas I’m constantly having to reset the dates for my analog watches with each passing month.  But the fact is most of us don’t sport digital watches for the simple reason that they just don’t look as nice.  And that’s OK (at least in my book).

But back to my main gripe: wearing two watches is totally unacceptable for any reasonably-grounded human being.  This is the wealth equivalent of driving a Bentley or owning a Vertu mobile phone  – you do it to remind everyone around you that you can, not because the marginal utility of the product itself even remotely justifies its exorbitant cost.  And it’s the stylistic equivalent of wearing pants with one leg rolled up (unless while riding a bike) or wearing a polo with the collar popped – you do it because you think it’s cool, not because it is cool.  Rather, it is astronomically uncool.

And what I find truly rich about Gardner’s apparent wealth flaunting is the hypocrisy of it all.  His website has quotes like “money is the least important component of wealth” and “net worth does not equal self worth”.  The site is a standing monument to the man himself, highlighting everything about Gardner that makes him so wonderful.  Does he do this to give everyone hope and something to strive for?  Perhaps.  But we can be damn sure he does it to turn a profit too.  Naturally, visitors to the site are given myriad opportunities to purchase something related to the man, ranging from $40 DVDs of his speaking tours to $15 women’s tees.  And he’s also happy to tell us that his book was just translated to Chinese.

Again, I don’t begrudge the man his accomplishments or his wealth.  In a vaccuum, his story is certainly a remarkable one that deserves special recognition.  Plus, his brokerage company apparently donates a portion of its profits to local community development, and he is in the process of setting up a philanthropic foundation.  This is all well and good.  But the two watches are simply too much to stomach, making me wonder whether the nods toward charity belie a more selfish motive – trying to come off good optically when deep down this man is motivated mostly by self-interest and personal enrichment.  It’s all strikingly similar to those charlatans who go around preaching that prosperity gospel nonsense.  Make no mistake – that warm and fuzzy feeling they are peddling is a product.  And the more we consume of it, the richer these folks get.

The Reason Project

rp_logoMy man Sam Harris (of The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation fame) has finally got his Reason Project up-and-running.  I guess I shouldn’t say finally given that the guy has been plenty occupied studying for his PhD in neuroscience.  In any event, per the website, “The Reason Project is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. The foundation draws on the talents of prominent and creative thinkers in a wide range of disciplines to encourage critical thinking and erode the influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world.”  The project’s advisory board is a venerable who’s who of atheists, philosophers, writers, biologists and thinkers, including the likes of Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan, Cliff Asness and Steven Pinker.  Oh goody!

Moneyball The Movie

I know that many of you out there are Michael Lewis fans.  I also know that you tend to be sports fans as well.  This means you likely enjoyed the marriage of the two that came in the form of Moneyball, that brilliant little book that explained how objective statistical analysis supplanted subjective judgment in the building and management of professional baseball teams.  Well, even more exciting than the book itself – yes, I consider the combination of sports and statistics to be “exciting” – is news that the book will soon be made into a movie.  And check out the cast thus far: Steven Soderbergh as director, Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, and Demetri Martin as Paul DePodesta.  That’s some serious talent, yo.

Of White Tigers And The Gandhi Family

Following the always reliable advice of B-Dubs, I’m currently reading The White Tiger by Indian author Aravind Adiga.  Though just a hundred pages in, I quite like what I’ve discovered thus far.  As an example, consider the below quote, which was relayed by the story’s narrator/protagonist while pondering the need for 36 million different gods in the Hindu religion:

It’s true that all these gods seem to do awfully little work – much like our politicians – and yet keep winning reelection to their golden thrones in heaven, year after year.

The book is fascinating in how it examines social disparities, political corruption, and religion all while pulling the veil back on an India most of us will never know.  Really good stuff.

In somewhat related news, check out Adiga’s piece on the strange permanence of the Gandhi family in Indian politics over at The Daily Beast.

An Ironic Moment

I enjoyed a wonderful moment of irony today.  During a rather lazy Sunday afternoon, I lied on the couch with Hurley (Lizzi was at yoga) reading a book called Irreligion while listening to There Will Be A Light, a collaboration between Ben Harper and The Blind Boys of Alabama.  The irony being that I was reading a book about the nonexistence of God while listening to a gospel album (and a great one at that).

For those of you so inclined, Irreligion is a brief philosophical treatment of the arguments against the existence of God, told from the sometimes circuitous point of a view of a mathematician (John Allen Paulos).  It’s a worthwhile read, largely because it’s short (145 pages) and it helps put some meat on arguments that appeal to logic when it comes to debating religion.  Being able to throw out words like “anthropic” and “ontological” will undoubtedly help render your opponent verbally impotent in any such debate.  Here’s one quote (of serveral) that stuck with me:

Oddly, the fact that we and all life have evolved from simpler forms by natural selection disturbs fundamentalists who are completely unfazed by the biblical claim that we come from dirt.

Side note – I was also sipping a very tasty pinot noir from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand.  In addition to satisfying the taste buds, the wine met two important criteria for me: 1) it was reasonably priced; and 2) it had a really cool name.  The winery is called Sileni, which got its name from the wise and loyal companions of Bacchus, the Roman god of wine.  The Sileni were said to have loved celebrating good food, good wine and good company.  Here, here!

Not All Hope Is Lost

For those of you worried that we may be entering another Great Depression, rest assured.  Renowned business futurist and opportunist extraordinaire, Harry S. Dent, has a new book out called The Great Depression Ahead.  The reason this leads me to be optimistic is that this is the same guy who wrote a book back in 2004 called The Great Bubble Boom Ahead, where he predicted good times would last into 2010.  Below is a nice little taste of the predictions readers were treated to in that wonderful book (from the description on Amazon.com):

Dent gives us all something to look forward to, including:

** The Dow hitting 40,000 by the end of the decade

** The Nasdaq advancing at least ten times from its October 2001 lows to around 13,500, and potentially as high as 20,000 by 2009

** Another strong advance in stocks in 2005, with a significant correction into around September/October 2006

** The Great Boom resurging into its final and strongest stage in 2007, and even more fully in 2008, lasting until late 2009 to early 2010

Dent’s amazing ability to track and forecast our financial future is renowned, and here he takes that ability to the next level, showing not only what our economy will look like but also how it will affect us as individuals, as organizations, and as a culture. From the upcoming wealth revolution to the essential principles of entrepreneurial success, the book describes a new society where economic and philanthropic development go hand in hand.

In The Next Great Bubble Boom, Dent shows not only how the economic growth of the late 1990s was a prelude to the true great boom right around the corner but how all of us can reap its benefits.

Good Luck Being President

The author Dave Eggers, he of A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius and McSweeney’s fame, started a non-profit a few years back called 826 Valencia (named after its address in San Francisco).  The goal of Valencia is to support the writing efforts of kids aged 6-18, offering “a variety of free programs and services throughout the school year and summer months including drop-in tutoring, field trips, specialized workshops, in-school assistance, and extensive student publishing.”

In the inaugural spirit that is sweeping America, the good folks at Valencia compiled some students’ notes to the incoming President and created a book that will be released the day Obama takes office.  It’s called Thanks and Have Fun Running the Country and appears to be comprised of really funny and adorable notes from Obama’s pint-sized well-wishers.  A NY Times piece this weekend gave the book a little shout-out.

My favorite from the piece:

Dear Obama,

If I were president I would have fun, because I could run fast.

— Kenja Zelaya, age 6, Los Angeles

I also liked this one, which captures the innocence of its young author in a way that belies the maturity of its delivery.  And I love the ending.

Dear President Obama,

I am small, quiet, smart. I love to swim and play basketball. My mom and dad are from the Dominican Republic. I am going to the Dominican Republic next year. I think you should try to change the world by building shelters for the people who live in the streets. It’s the beginning of January, and it’s cold. Good luck being the president.

— Pamela Mejia, age 11, Boston

Good stuff.

Justice Is Served

Though a recent reading of Consider The Lobster by David Foster Wallace made me consider the ridiculousness of Hollywood award shows, I must say that I’m quite happy about the solid showing from Slumdog Millionaire during last night’s Golden Globes.  Best score, best screenplay, best director and – most importanly – best picture.  Three cheers for Mr. Boyle and crew.  Despite the inconvenient fact that I have yet to view any of the other films up for the title of “best”, I’m going to go out on the ill-informed limb and make the statement that justice was indeed served last night.  As I mentioned in a previous post, Millionaire was a brilliant piece of filmmaking and deserving of every piece of acknowledgement thrown its way during the awards season. 

Meanwhile, back to feeling disgusted about Hollywood award shows (from the aforementioned Mr. Wallace himself):

The [awards shows'] notorious commercialism and hypocrisy disgust many of the millions and millions and millions of viewers who tune in during prime time to watch the presentations…We pretty much all tune in, despite the grotesquerie of watching an industry congratulate itself on its pretense that it’s still an art form, of hearing people in $5,000 gowns invoke lush cliches of surprise and humility scripted by publicists, etc. – the whole cynical post-modern deal – but we all still seem to watch.  To care.  Even though the hypocrisy hurts, even though opening grosses and marketing strategies are now bigger news than the movies themselves, even though Cannes and Sundance have become nothing more than enterprise zones…the whole mainstream celebrity culture is rushing to cash in and all the while congratulating itself on pretending not to cash in.  Underneath it all, though, we know the whole thing sucks.

Who Will Watch the Watchmen?

During my wedding/honeymoon extravaganza, I read my first graphic novel ever.  Of course, I didn’t start with your run-of-the-mill comic.  Rather, I decided to start with arguably the best graphic novel of all time, at least according to those crazies in charge of the Hugo Award and ranking Time Magazine’s top 100 English language books since 1923.  Yes, my intro to the graphic novel genre was none other than The Watchmen, an absolutely brilliant and engrossing look at our apocalypse-focused world through the lens of what is now commonly-held as your standard anti-hero (or heroes).  Rather than trying to sum it up on my own, here’s the take from our friends at Wikipedia:

Watchmen is set in 1985, in an alternate history United States where costumed adventurers are real and the country is edging closer to a nuclear war with the Soviet Union (the Doomsday Clock is at five minutes to midnight). It tells the story of a group of past and present superheroes and the events surrounding the mysterious murder of one of their own. Watchmen depicts superheroes as real people who must confront ethical and personal issues, who struggle with neuroses and failings, and who—with one notable exception—lack anything recognizable as super powers. Watchmen‘s deconstruction of the conventional superhero archetype, combined with its innovative adaptation of cinematic techniques and heavy use of symbolism, multi-layered dialogue, and metafiction, has influenced both comics and film.

This novel is great and I highly recommend any of you with an interest in clever social commentary and in exploring different art forms to check it out.  However, for those of you too lazy to deal with the 400-page tome, all you need to do is wait for Spring 2009 and you can treat yourself to a cinematic viewing of the story.  Much to my delight, Zack Snyder (the same guy who brought us the awesome movie 300 based on Frank Miller’s graphic novel) directed what looks to be a great film tribute to the story.  Check out the movie trailer below (if it doesn’t load immediately, just refresh your page).  I highly recommend a lot of volume.

Fortune’s Formula

ff.jpgA professional acquaintance recently recommended that I read William Poundstone’s Fortune’s Formula, which he told me Bill Gross (famed PIMCO investor) proclaimed one of the greatest investment books in recent memory. In fact-checking such a promotion, I was unable to find confirmation. However, as a random aside totally unrelated to the book itself, I did come across Gross’ December 2006 investment outlook piece, which both gives a shout-out to the book as well as provides a nice commentary on risk, leverage and distortions of reality that dotted the investment landscape prior to the onset of the credit crunch in late summer 2007. In railing against the prevailing conventional wisdom, Gross’ observations turned out to be quite prescient:

under the new world assumption of today’s low volatility and narrow asset risk spreads…there is a maximum leverage point…beyond which returns can be maintained only with increasing and significant expectations of financial loss. We estimate that the maximum alpha an average hedge fund can generate in today’s marketplace utilizing a broad array of financial assets which average a 50 basis point risk premium, displayed in Chart 2, is 200 basis points. Any attempt to go further by levering up an already…levered portfolio increasingly risks significant and in some cases, total loss of principal… I have a strong sense that the ability to lever any or all asset returns via increasing leverage is reaching a climax and therefore, that CPDO, corporate credit spreads, and more importantly, sophomoric assumptions of future assets returns in all markets may require some future compromise.

One of the graphs incorporated into the article illustrates nicely the paradigm shift between new world and old world perceptions of risk and reward.

chart2.gif

Now, back to the book itself. I must admit that I am of two minds when it comes to judgment. On the one hand, I identified greatly with the subject matter, most of which was presented in an engaging and easily digestible manner. The NY Times described it as perhaps “…the world’s first history book, gambling primer, mathematics text, economics manual, personal finance guide and joke book in a single volume.” All topics that are generally right up my alley.

[Read more...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.