Tax Smackdown

Ari Fleischer lays the wood on the taxman in a WSJ OpEd today.

Today, Mr. Obama and many congressional Democrats want the “wealthy” to pay even more so there is more money for them to redistribute. The president says he wants the wealthy to pay their “fair share.” Who can argue with that? But he never defines what that means. Is it fair for 10% to pay 70% of the income tax? Does he believe they should pay 75%, or 95%, or does fairness mean they should pay it all? It’s clever politics to speak like that, but it is risky policy.

Mr. Obama is adding to this trend with his “Make Work Pay” tax cut that means almost 50% of the country will no longer pay any income taxes, up from a little over 40% today. A certain amount of income redistribution in a capitalistic society is healthy, but this goes too far. The economic and moral problem is that when 50% of the country gets benefits without paying for them and an increasingly smaller number of taxpayers foot the bill, the spinning triangle will no longer be able to support itself. Eventually, it will spin so slowly that it falls down, especially when the economy is contracting and the number of wealthy taxpayers is in sharp decline.

As I’ve long argued, there is nothing fair about our tax system.  Nothing at all.  And it’s destined to become increasingly less fair under Obama.  Baked into the government’s monopoly on force is the notion that it can dip into one’s pocket as much as it wants and there isn’t a damn thing anyone can do about it.  Not happy with the way government is spending your money?  Too bad!  Shut up and pay up, bitches.

Random Japan – Jobs Edition

Here’s a nice little view into Japan’s socialist tendencies.  According to today’s Asahi Shimbun, a real estate company in Fukuoka has been ordered to pay a former college senior ¥750,000 (~$7,500) for retracting a job offer last year.  According to the judge presiding over the case, “canceling a job offer on grounds of an unprecedented recession is not a justifiable cause.”  Apparently immaterial in the eyes of the judge is the economic shitstorm underway just outside his window and the impact it’s having on the ability of businesses to not only pay their employees but to remain going concerns.  Indeed, the Japanese real estate industry has seen multiple bankruptcies over the past several months.  Stupid stubborn stupid.

Amen, Brother

I can’t believe I was sleeping on the absurdity of UN Resolution 62/154 on “Combating defamation of religions”.  Luckily, The Economist and Christopher Hitchens were not.

Crook Joins The Bandwagon

While President Obama and his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, choose to smirk condescendingly at the mere mention of the topic, support for drug legalization continues to gain strength in both numbers and quality.  Add Clive Crook of the FT and The Atlantic to the growing list of rationalists:

How much misery can a policy cause before it is acknowledged as a failure and reversed? The US “war on drugs” suggests there is no upper limit. The country’s implacable blend of prohibition and punitive criminal justice is wrong-headed in every way: immoral in principle, since it prosecutes victimless crimes, and in practice a disaster of remarkable proportions. Yet for a US politician to suggest wholesale reform of this brainless regime is still seen as an act of reckless self-harm.

Even a casual observer can see that much of the damage done in the US by illegal drugs is a result of the fact that they are illegal, not the fact that they are drugs. Vastly more lives are blighted by the brutality of prohibition, and by the enormous criminal networks it has created, than by the substances themselves. This is true of cocaine and heroin as well as of soft drugs such as marijuana. But the assault on consumption of marijuana sets the standard for the policy’s stupidity.

I’m With Newt On This One

Seriously, who cares?  Why are we so obsessed with such trivial nonsense?

The Wheels On The Bus Go Round And Round

Barron’s ran an interesting interview with Professor William Black, former deputy director at the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, on The Lessons of the Savings-and-Loan Crisis.  His take on the current crisis and Washington’s response?  Let’s just say he’s not a fan.  Here’s a part that resonated with me given my general distaste for our leaders these days:

We have failed bankers giving advice to failed regulators on how to deal with failed assets. How can it result in anything but failure? If they are going to get any truthful investigation, the Democrats picked the wrong financial team. Tim Geithner, the current Secretary of the Treasury, and Larry Summers, chairman of the National Economic Council, were important architects of the problems. Geithner especially represents a failed regulator, having presided over the bailouts of major New York banks.

In Honor Of Tax Day

Caption This Photo

12churches-600

This week’s New York Times Magazine had an interesting piece on a Nigerian religious import called the Redeemed Christian Church of God, which is apparently taking the U.S. (and the world) by storm.  It’s a worthwhile piece, if only for the entrepreneurial undertone that runs throughout.  I’ve long considered the world’s various religions much closer in constitution to McDonald’s than legitimate non-profits.  That is, religions are highly motivated to multiply their flocks because there is strength (and money!) in numbers, and so they make very determined efforts to establish large global footprints.  Therein lies the motivation for religions to so aggressively recruit new converts and for them to do everything they can to keep their members from fleeing.  After all, they need those sticky, recurring revenue streams that come in the form of tithes.  It should therefore come as no surprise that the world’s Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) have in their original doctrines the harsh penalty of death for acts of apostasy.  In any event, this article does a decent job of underscoring the commercial drive that is necessary for any religion to flourish, even if that’s not its primary intent.

Moving on to the fun part of this post, the above photo leads the magazine’s story and is simply too funny to escape sarcastic comment.  It apparently captures a preacher in full throat and a parishioner overcome by the holy spirit.  Though the photo is funny enough on its own, helping to illustrate the notion that truth is sometimes better than fiction, we can have a jolly good time making up our own captions.  JJ says the guy looks like he’s bowling and the woman is searching for loose change.  I say the dude is gearing up for a powerful back-handed ass slap, a practice designed to help dispel evil spirits.  The more evil there is to be banished, the more of a running start required.

Saluting The Seals

I awoke this morning to the wonderful news that the captain of the Maersk Alabama, Richard Phillips, had been rescued by U.S. military personnel as his pirate-commandeered life boat floated roughly 20 miles off the coast of Somalia.  What’s even better about this is that I totally called the military procedure that should be used to free him from those pirates.  Yesterday, growing frustrated by our inability to rescue the poor guy from his Somali captors, I turned to Lizzi and said that we should just post a couple snipers on one of the nearby Navy ships and have them take out the pirates in orchestrated fashion.  I knew it would be a complicated maneuver, needing to be precisely coordinated in rough waters, but I figured it was the most feasible operation being considered.  Either that or have some Seals approach the vessel from below, but such close-quartered combat would likely run higher risks of injuring Mr. Phillips.

And sure as shit, the headline this morning read “Hostage captain rescued; Navy snipers kill three pirates”, news that I greeted with a proud, Tigeresque fist pump.  Fearing that the pirates were beginning to act erratically, and spying an AK-47 being held to the captain’s back, U.S. Navy Seal snipers, having received the green light from President Obama himself, took the nearest opportunity of visibility to simultaneously deliver three head shots that rendered the pirates dead on impact.  Three shots, three kills.  Booyah!

In addition to confirming my military genius (said in clear jest), I couldn’t help but be filled with an overwhelming sense of pride.  While there are myriad reasons to be happy to be American (despite our country’s many faults, it remains the best the world has to offer), a situation where this sentiment would be entirely unambiguous would be one in which Mr. Phillips found himself.  Can you imagine what he was thinking out there on that lifeboat as not one, not two, but three U.S. navy ships surrounded him and his captors?  Here you are, one citizen floating in the Indian Ocean, being held by Somali pirates demanding a $2 million ransom for your life, and your country brings its military power to bear on your behalf.  In the naval equivalent of the Crocodile Dundee “that’s not a knife, this is a knife” exchange, the juxtaposition of that tiny lifeboat being surrounded and dwarfed by those Navy vessels would make for a powerful photograph.  Not only would it stand as testament to our military’s dominant reach and our willingness to battle piracy head-on, but it would also help to further illustrate that America stands at the ready to defend its citizens come hell or high water.

Though we’re certainly not alone in demonstrating such bravery and dedication in defense of our citizens – French special forces launched a rescue operation of their own a couple days back – this has to be considered a proud moment for our country.  I have no idea what sort of long-term effect this will have on the growing level of piracy in the region, but you’ve got to imagine that the willingness to attack American ships has to be slightly dented by these events (though I suppose the risk of retribution runs higher in the immediate aftermath).  Whatever the result, I’ll take this moment to stand in awe of the professionalism of those Seals.  But for their flawless execution under the most extreme circumstances, this situation easily could’ve ended in much uglier fashion.  Of course, they’ll say that they were simply doing what they were trained to, but this sets a great example for all of us.  Though similar perfection is likely beyond our everyday reach, we can all take some inspiration from their actions.  Particularly these days.

Out Of England

Lizzi and I watched Ricky Gervais’ HBO stand-up special Out of England tonight.  A die-hard Gervais fan, I found it quite good.  I particularly liked the part where he questions the wisdom of various children’s fables and nursery rhymes (e.g. What are kids supposed to learn from an egg that falls off a wall?  And why would the king send horses to put him back together?).  In addition to brilliant content, I really enjoy his style, which is highly self-deprecating and generally laid-back.  He strikes me as a guy who doesn’t take himself all that seriously, a notion strengthened by the fact that his trademark black v-neck had two very noticeable stains on the front.

Having seen a couple of his other stand-up routines, I’ve noticed that he’s quite the fan of Foster’s beer, parking one of the big blue cans behind his lecturn for the occasional sip.  I also noticed that the pub he frequents on his show Extras has Foster’s prominently displayed.  Referred to as being “Australian for beer” in its commercials, I learned on my recent trip Down Under that it’s virtually unheard of for Aussies to actually consume the product.  In fact, I’m told one would be hard pressed to find Foster’s in any respectable Aussie pub.  Interesting how these things work, eh?

Stanley Crouch On Mos Def

Stanley Crouch over at The Daily Beast took on the Mos Def disaster that I addressed in a previous post.  While his piece overall is a touch overdone (he seems to try way too hard to make his writing highbrow), I’m heartened by the fact that an accomplished observer like Crouch has taken notice of Mos Def (real name Dante Terrell Smith) and his utter ridiculousness.

Just a few weeks ago, Smith appeared on Real Time with Salman Rushdie and Christopher Hitchens, but his pretentious “brother from the projects” act did not go over well. His supposed courage to “express an unpopular opinion” was taken by Hitchens as an insult to the common intellectual knowledge that anyone should have about big issues in the contemporary world. Unlike those white Americans who have presented black illogic as a form of popular entertainment since the days of Malcolm X and Eldridge Cleaver, Hitchens was not having it and challenged Smith to back up his purported opinions. This is something the British are much better at than their American counterparts. Stuck in his act, Smith wavered forward, sinking with every syllable he uttered. That’s how it goes: When the right white people are encountered, contrived ethnic authenticity doesn’t cut it.

A Dream Denied

Detroit 15, Texas 2.  That didn’t take long.

Slice Of Awesome

c_04052009_520

Eddy, Texas Ranger

Don’t look now but my hometown Texas Rangers are off to a 3-0 start.  This means they’re roughly 2% complete with what I predict will be a perfect 162-0 season. Magical things happen when your shortstop is named Elvis.

Hear No Evil

The Fed has ordered the nineteen banks being forced to undergo “stress tests” to keep the results secret.  Yeah, that can’t be a good sign.  Sounds awfully similar to kids hiding their report cards from their parents.

Lacking Grace

On her show the other night, CNN’s Nancy Grace spent a couple minutes patting herself on the back for buying 100 boxes of Girl Scout cookies that were destined for our soldiers overseas.

Now, I certainly don’t mean to belittle anyone’s efforts at charity.  Especially these days, when giving is on such steep decline given the economic environment.  However, I don’t understand why Grace would bother with all the theatrics.  By publicizing the donation, her motivations would appear more self-serving than anything else.  If all she wanted to do was give these girls and their wonderful cause some publicity, why not just let them come on and explain what they’re doing?  Of course, she could still grab some of the goodwill she’s looking for by saying at the end that she and CNN have purchased some cookies to support the cause without giving us the details.  Instead, she makes a big show of handing one of those massive cardboard checks over to the girls that indicates she’s buying 100 boxes from them.  Just so you know, Girl Scout cookies range in price from $2.50 – $4.00 per box.  So at an average price of $3.25, we can guesstimate that Grace just ponied up a whopping $325.  Not only does she come off as self-serving in attempting to steal the spotlight, Grace also leaves the impression that she’s a bit of a cheapskate.

Again, I applaud the cause but the execution was totally botched.  Or maybe I’m just being too hard on Grace since I find her so incredibly annoying.  With that, I’ll leave you with a couple goodies from the Nancy Grace video vault.  Enjoy!

The Survivor’s Club

This guy Ben Sherwood has a new book out called The Survivor’s Club: The Secrets and Science That Could Save Your Life.  As the title suggests, the book basically takes a look at the experiences of survivors of various harrowing events and tries to extrapolate which attributes or circumstances allowed for their survival to occur. From what I can tell, Sherwood himself has never actually “survived” anything.  But he seems like a plenty smart guy, and the subject matter can be quite fascinating, so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.

But the guy is starting to grate for two primary reasons: 1) he says that belief in god is critical in helping people survive life or death scenarios (I’m guessing there are plenty of atheists who have survived near-death situations whose stories aren’t being told); and 2) he appears to be a tireless self-promoter, which makes me wonder if he’s just an opportunist.  I mean, the guy is literally everywhere it seems, always popping up on talk shows whenever something goes down, or writing a blog post to help guide us through a recession or tell us what to do when a mountain lion tries to rip our face off.  He’s even got a whole website dedicated to bringing together survivors so they can share their stories, or so people struggling with any problem under the sun can find comfort in numbers.  What really puts me over the edge is the fact that Glenn Beck has a soft spot for the guy.  That’s because his book’s lessons dovetail nicely with Beck’s apocalyptic view of America’s future, which will no doubt find people huddled in their underground bunkers surrounded by lots of guns, ammo and canned food.  And, of course, a dog-eared copy of Sherwood’s book.

What set me off on this rant was one of Sherwood’s timely posts following yet another horrific development.  After some psycho decided to kill a bunch of people at an immigration center in Binghampton, NY, Sherwood quite naturally popped up over at Huffington Post to – you guessed it – tell us all what to do when we find ourselves in a similar situation.  What bothered me were the instructions we were given should we find ourselves in a room with a nutjob who is trying to shoot everyone.

1. Escape (if you can).
2. Cover (find protection behind an object that will stop a bullet; look for chances to escape, especially during reloading).
3. Hide (then look for opportunities to escape.
4. Play dead (and look for ways to escape).
5. Attack the attacker (as a last resort, catching him by surprise or from behind).

And so I ask you, dear reader, what in the above is not obvious to anyone born with natural instincts?  Seriously, do you need to be reminded that your first instinct should be to try to get away from the attacker?  And I love the extra help he provides in parentheses.  Escape (if you can) should’ve been followed with a 1b. Don’t escape (if you can’t).  Attack the attacker by surprise or from behind (as opposed to asking for his permission, I suppose).  And he continuously reminds us to keep looking for ways to escape.  As if we’re going to stop thinking about escaping when the first attempt proves impossible!  Does he really think he’s teaching us anything with this?

Joint Chiefs Of Grass

The fine folks at Vanity Fair are having a laugh.

obama-pot-cabinet-thumb-500x393

Leading Indicators

I read this morning that Alan Greenspan considers men’s underwear sales to be a prescient economic indicator.  Apparently, demand for the product is generally rather consistent, and declines in purchases can be interpreted as men choosing to sacrifice clean undies for more critical needs (like food, or the latest Damien Hirst animal dipped in formaldehyde).  A bit unconventional to be sure, but I can see how monitoring such statistics could be effective.  It reminds me of a less official approach that I’ve heard some Japanese economists promote: the shorter the skirts that Japanese women are wearing, the better off the economy is.  I’m not kidding.

Along those lines, I’d like to promote my own socially-informed economic indicator: the brighter the tie colors of Japanese salarymen, the better the economy.  Being famous for wearing dark suits and dark ties, which aligns nicely with the generally morose view of the economy most Japanese have embraced since the early 1990s, I’m going to guess that flush pockets and optimistic outlooks might lead businessmen to be more expressive with their neckwear.

Mad Props

Though not without its missteps (bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia?), Obama’s trip overseas was a smashing success on the diplomacy front.  Obviously, he didn’t really get what he wanted in terms of military support for Afghanistan, so I suppose his trip wasn’t all that productive on a technical front.  But I must say that Mr. and Mrs. Obama rose to the occasion when it came to improving the image of the U.S. abroad.  Of course, conservative talking heads are up in arms because Obama basically went hat-in-hand to the world as he asked for them to forgive us our trespasses.  That’s because, in their view, America can do no wrong.  But we did plenty of wrong over the past eight years and our reputation abroad was severely impaired as a result.  One of the main reasons I wanted Obama to win was because I knew he would put a better face on America.  And he did exactly that during this trip.  He and Michelle totally dominated the G-20, overshadowing everyone around them several times over; they had the European people (and press!) eating from their hands.  For all the faults I find with Obama on the policy front, I’m thankful he’s our man under the bright lights with the world’s leaders.  At the very least, it’s a nice break from the recent past when I was forced to watch our president through my fingers during such outings.

How To Avoid Black Swans

Nassim Nicholas Taleb had a great piece in the FT today that is worth reading.  It puts forth his ten principles for a black swan-proof world.  Of the ten, each was insightful and pretty much on target.  I particularly liked this one:

3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.

Slice Of Awesome

Burning Questions

Two things I’ve been wondering about were recently addressed via timely pieces in a couple of my favorite rags – Slate and Reason.

The first relates to the 2016 Olympics.  Two cities very near and dear to me – Chicago and Tokyo – are locked in heated battle to win the right to host the event.  Similar to the sentiment expressed in a recent Reason piece, I’ve long wondered why these cities even bother since a win would very likely mean taking on monstrous amounts of debt (not a great time for that, by the way) and generating tons of headaches for local residents (traffic, noise, etc.).  And the total costs of hosting (including security, infrastructure, etc.) appear to often outweigh any long-term economic gains.  Of course, judging by what we hear from our local media and politicians, one would think that hosting events like the Olympics is a no-brainer.  However, it turns out the benefits of hosting these events should be treated as anything but foregone conclusions, as can be seen in sites such as this one, which encourages a balanced debate on whether it makes any fiscal sense for Chicago to make its push. This topic resonates with me for another reason as well – two economists who are leading experts on the economics of sport are Robert Baade and Vic Matheson, two of my former professors in college.  Indeed, thanks to taking his Intro to Economics class my freshman year, Professor Baade was the reason I became interested in the science of economics in the first place.  But for him, I would’ve become a podiatrist.  Or a used car salesman.  I’m sure of it.

The second topic relates to the contradictory nature of how certain countries refer to themselves.  In case you find yourself in a state of serious boredom someday, I recommend that you peruse a list of official country names.  A comprehensive review of that list will elicit more than a handful of head scratches and raised eyebrows (e.g. did you know that Greece’s official name is the Hellenic Republic?).  The name that most often makes me bristle is the highly counterintuitive Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (aka North Korea).  Obviously, there is nothing democratic about the DPRK, and it’s policies are certainly not about the “people” (rather, they’re about the “person”, that being Lil Kim).  And the Democratic Republic of the Congo ain’t so democratic either.  So I often wondered, “why do the least democratic countries have the most democratic-sounding names?”.  Luckily, Slate asked the same question.

Down With Brown

In a classic “oh, the gall!” moment, rapper Chris Brown pleaded not guilty to two felony charges for allegedly beating his girlfriend, pop singer Rihanna.  Judging by what I’ve read and the pictures I’ve seen, there doesn’t seem much doubt that Brown did punch, bite and choke Riahanna during a fight over a text message.  Not only was the deed itself despicable – and, by the way, Rihanna told police this wasn’t the first time – but Brown’s refusal to own up to it is enough to make one’s head explode with irate frustration.  Clearly, the guy is a scumbag of the first degree, and here’s hoping he receives his karmic due at some point.  What’s even scarier is that Rihanna has gone back to him, even pushing to keep him out of jail.  This type of behavior among battered women is apparently commonplace, which is sad not only in the instance but also in the message it sends to our country’s youth.  As the NY Times pointed out in a recent piece, a shocking number of kids participating in a study actually blamed Rihanna for the attack.  Not only giving Brown a pass on his behavior is bad enough, but blaming the victim?  Brown could help correct this warped response by owning his demons and affirming the notion that this is not acceptable behavior under any circumstances.  Instead, he’s attempting to exploit his fame, and the misplaced forgiveness of a broken woman, to get a free pass.  Clearly a coward, I suppose we shouldn’t expect much in the way of courage from him anyway.

Some Stimulating Conversation

The Japanese parliament spent almost a year debating a stimulus bill designed to give citizens (and foreign taxpayers, like us) handouts ranging from ¥12,000 – ¥20,000 ($120-$200).  The bill finally passed and we received our checks in the mail today.  Two things strike me as interesting here.  First, what the hell is such a nominal amount supposed to accomplish?  Even when I was a cash-starved college student, that type of money didn’t move the needle.  Second, why haven’t governments learned the lessons of the past when it comes to such handouts.  That is – they don’t work!  This is especially true for Japan, which has one of the highest savings rates around.  Given the highly uncertain future, there is no reason to expect the Japanese won’t save the bulk of that money, which would obviously defeat the purpose of the handout, itself an impotent attempt to stimulate consumption (I put impotent and stimulate in the same sentence on purpose, hehe).  I could see how such handouts may stand an outside chance of working in spend-happy America, but the whole notion strikes me as entirely disingenuous.  After all, over-consumption is what got us into this mess in the first place.  Any money the government returns to us should be saved, not spent.  But DC doesn’t want us thinking that way, believing it more prudent to spend what we don’t have rather than save what we do.  Monkey see, monkey do!

Slice Of Awesome

090413_cartoon_c_a13805_p465

Huffington Post, Fox Nation And Media Bias

The brain trust over at Fox News, hellbent on bringing their warped version of fairness and balance to the web’s news aggregation sites/blogosphere, has created a new site called The Fox Nation.  It’s clearly designed to counter the ultra liberal Huffington Post, a goal with which I have absolutely no problem.  I do take issue, however, with the ludicrous notion that anything Fox News does could be even remotely considered fair or balanced.  Maybe the net effect of the company’s efforts provides some sort of balance – that’s what happens when one extreme (e.g. NBC) is combined with another from the completely opposite end of the spectrum (e.g. Fox News) – but nothing about Fox makes its slogan genuine in the slightest.  Again, I appreciate the fact that we’ve got a conservative voice in the media with the likes of Fox and the Wall Street Journal.  I really, really do.  Just don’t insult our intelligence by holding yourself up as a bastion of fairness.   It’s simply unbecoming.

On the topic of media bias, I thought it would be fun to compare the front pages of both Huffington Post and Fox Nation so I could see how each site allows its biases to color the headlines.  Naturally, HuffPo had plenty of headlines and blog posts praising all things green energy, Obama, and NBC.  And, equally unsurprising, Fox Nation was riddled with headlines against Obama, led by a big photo of Newt Gingrich with the headline “U.S. at greater risk under Obama”.  Not wanting to abandon the traditional conservative playbook, at the very top was a lead for an article called “God is back!”.  First rule of business – know your customer!

Believe it or not, HuffPo’s lead titles had a rather official feel to them, actually taking on the form of proper reportage.  There were even – dare I say – glimmers of balance, with multiple posters (including Arianna Huffington herself) actually complaining about certain of Obama’s policies.  The overall tone, though, was generally positive.  Not too much disparaging of the “other” side, at least not judging by the various titles.  To be fair, there’s plenty of anti-conservative vitriol to be found on HuffPo if one looks close enough (just read a post or two from Bob Cesca).  But I generally found the site to be rather benign, at least in a superficial sense.

Fox Nation, on the other hand, came out guns a blazing with plenty of scaremongering.  Attack! Attack! Attack!  Here are some wonderful examples of their belligerent headlines, in addition to the Newt one above:

  • Krauthammer body slams Obama!
  • Hannity: Obama imitating Dixie Chicks
  • Dick Morris says Obama repealed the Declaration of Independence
  • New Yorkers turn against Gov. Paterson
  • Obama won’t call genocide, genocide
  • Notre Dame students hold Obama protests
  • Newsweek shows it anti-religion bias – again
  • Atheists attack Mark Twain church funding
  • Chris Matthews continues to embarrass

Now let’s look at how differently the two sites linked to a London Times interview with Bob Dylan.  In it, Dylan speaks quite favorably of Obama, saying the man’s life story reads like a Hollywood script.   So here’s the title of the HuffPo link:  “Bob Dylan on Obama: He’s like a fictional character”.  Sounds about right.  Of course, it’s easier to do that when the tone of the article fits perfectly with one’s agenda, but the bottom line is they got it right.  Fox Nation, on the other hand, was incredibly misleading with its title:  “Bob Dylan: Obama says outrageous things”.  Here’s the exchange that includes Dylan’s reference to Obama saying outrageous things:

Times: What else did you find compelling about [Obama]?

Dylan: Well, mainly his take on things. His writing style hits you on more than one level. It makes you feel and think at the same time and that is hard to do. He says profoundly outrageous things. He’s looking at a shrunken head inside of a glass case in some museum with a bunch of other people and he’s wondering if any of these people realize that they could be looking at one of their ancestors.

Talk about taking something out of context!  The Fox Nation lead totally betrayed the actual tone of the article, no doubt a ruse designed to bank on the fact that most people will limit their exposure to the story to just that one headline.  There’s nothing fair and balanced about that at all.  That’s just downright misleading.

Speaking Of Rushdie

Did you know he was once married to Padma Lakshmi?  In case you don’t know who she is, click on her name or watch the clip below.  I’m not sure whether I’m more impressed with the idea that Rushdie was once able to frolic in the nude with her or more horrified that he actually let her get away.  Wow.

Most Definitely Not

JJ reminded me of a post I intended to write over the weekend about last week’s Real Time with Bill Maher.

I appreciate Maher’s goal of bringing folks from the world of entertainment and the general political intelligentsia together to discuss the issues of the day.  Ideally, such an effort would foster a debate capable of cutting across multiple demographics that would reach a wide audience.  However, there are moments when this experiment runs painfully awry.  We saw such an instance this past week when Maher’s three panelists were the esteemed Salman Rushdie and Christopher Hitchens….and Mos Def (whose name I assume is short for “most definitely”).

To say this was an intellectual mismatch would be an understatement.  Now, I don’t knock Mos Def for his inability to match wits with Rushdie and Hitchens.  After all, they are two of the brighter bulbs around – insightful and cunning agent provocateurs with a sometimes dangerous gift for words.  Most of us would resemble mental midgets when compared to those two.  My problem is that Mos Def has too high an opinion of himself, so much so that he actually dominated the discussion with largely incoherent dribble, stealing from us an opportunity to hear the thoughtful ruminations of the other panelists.  If Mos Def had more of a social IQ, he would’ve been switched on to the idea that he didn’t have much substance to add to the discussion and should therefore sit back, listen and pick his spots.  This way, the audience could actually learn something while he would also come off as thoughtful (and respectful in the presence of genius).  Instead, the discussion was hijacked by an ignoramus with a horrendous signal-to-noise ratio, and we were robbed of a chance to enjoy the musings of two truly great minds.

There have been other examples of this in the past (I recall Chris Rock having a similarly bad performance), and so I’d suggest that Maher do two things: 1) do a better job of vetting his guests; and 2) do a better job of managing the discussion.  The fact that he allowed Mos Def to run roughshod was a failure of the moderator above all else.

I still love the show, even if Maher’s political agenda sometimes makes me cringe (particularly when it comes to fiscal issues).  And as much as I love Rushdie and Hitchens, my favorite guest so far has got to be Corey Booker, the mayor of Newark, NJ.  What a thoughtful, articulate and passionate guy.  He’s exactly the type of leadership we need in government today.  And Maher should invite him back every chance he gets.

More Irish Love

ESPN’s Bruce Feldman ranks ND among the top ten teams with the best shot at winning the BCS title.  The drumbeat grows louder!

Springtime In Japan

Spring has officially arrived in Tokyo, an event marked by the blooming of cherry blossoms across the city.

dsc03792

dsc03784

dsc037942

dsc03805

Some Irish Love

In a marked break with the recent past, my beloved Irish are getting some serious love as Spring practices get underway this offseason.  ESPN – which never passes on an opportunity to bash ND football – actually ran a series of complimentary articles on the Irish last week, including Ivan Maisel’s look at how experience has finally returned to the Golden Dome and Graham Watson’s take on the depth found in the Irish backfield.  And Beano Cook has even gone on record suggesting the Irish have a chance to play for the national title this year, predicting that they’d win at least ten games in the process.  We’ll forget for the moment Beano’s many past misfires, including certain ones related to ND (e.g. Ron Powlus will win multiple Heismans).  But Beano isn’t alone when it comes to expecting great things from the Irish this year.  Maisel himself predicted that ND would win at least nine games and go to a BCS bowl.  And it wasn’t just ESPN giving ND some love.   There was Andy Staples over at CNNSi writing about the defensive renaissance currently underway in South Bend and the Sporting News’ Matt Hayes piped in on the team’s spirited practices this Spring.

Man o man, I can’t wait for September to roll around!

A New Strategy?

Lil Kim and his brain-washed military brethren violated yet another UN resolution yesterday with the test launch of a missile that appears capable of reaching Alaska.  In addition to reminding me of how close I am to an unstable megalomaniac (the missile flew over Japan),  I was struck by how toothless the UN response was to the launch.  And by toothless I mean completely non-existent.  Thanks to concerns voiced by a motley crew of Russia, China, Libya and Vietnam that any reprimand could risk further alienating the hermit regime, the UN elected to convene its “emergency” meeting without a peep of condemnation.  That’ll show ‘em!

But maybe this bit of inaction could turn out to be a master stroke in the never-ending game of psychological warfare that has long been waged against these rogue regimes.  After all, this whole UN resolution stuff clearly hasn’t met with much success historically.  I mean, the likes of Iran, Sudan and North Korea have been violating their respective resolutions for years (as did Iraq before W came along with guns blazing).  And the UN’s protestations against such brazen acts of defiance have had very little measurable effect.  Perhaps ignoring the little bastard will work better?  Given that he does resemble a spoiled little child throwing the occasional hissy fit when he doesn’t get his way, maybe ignoring his silly little antics (rather than yelling at him then giving him more candy) will serve us all better in the long run.

Onward March!

Add Joe Klein from Time to the growing list of marijuana legalization proponents.

Slice Of Awesome

cartoons_05

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.