Ari Fleischer lays the wood on the taxman in a WSJ OpEd today.
Today, Mr. Obama and many congressional Democrats want the “wealthy” to pay even more so there is more money for them to redistribute. The president says he wants the wealthy to pay their “fair share.” Who can argue with that? But he never defines what that means. Is it fair for 10% to pay 70% of the income tax? Does he believe they should pay 75%, or 95%, or does fairness mean they should pay it all? It’s clever politics to speak like that, but it is risky policy.
Mr. Obama is adding to this trend with his “Make Work Pay” tax cut that means almost 50% of the country will no longer pay any income taxes, up from a little over 40% today. A certain amount of income redistribution in a capitalistic society is healthy, but this goes too far. The economic and moral problem is that when 50% of the country gets benefits without paying for them and an increasingly smaller number of taxpayers foot the bill, the spinning triangle will no longer be able to support itself. Eventually, it will spin so slowly that it falls down, especially when the economy is contracting and the number of wealthy taxpayers is in sharp decline.
As I’ve long argued, there is nothing fair about our tax system. Nothing at all. And it’s destined to become increasingly less fair under Obama. Baked into the government’s monopoly on force is the notion that it can dip into one’s pocket as much as it wants and there isn’t a damn thing anyone can do about it. Not happy with the way government is spending your money? Too bad! Shut up and pay up, bitches.







