Some Good News!

According to the latest American Religious Identification Survey, the number of non-religious among us is on the rise.  The percentage of Americans claiming “no religion” has grown to 15% and is “…the only group to have grown in every state of the Union.”  And the percentage of the American population listed as atheist or agnostic (1.6%) exceeds the percentage that is Mormon (1.4%) and Muslim (0.6%).  There is hope, my non-religious friends!

Of Rushbo And Ganja

c_03052009_520

The Republican Party is in complete disarray.  Those of you who saw highlights from the CPAC convention last week know exactly what I’m talking about.  Any party that claps when someone recylces the old (and very wrong) conspiracy theory that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen has jumped the shark.  And any party that worships at the alter of Rush Limbaugh deserves the indignation sent its way.  I’m amazed at the chorus line of Republicans who at one moment discover their backbones and stand justly against the spiteful and divisive Limbaugh, and then find themselves – moments later – lying prostrate at his feet as they grovel for forgiveness.  Mark Sanford, Michael Steele and Bobby Jindal are some of the more prominent recent examples.  In a word, Limbaugh’s a douche.  He’s an angry, bitter and poisonous mountain of a man who preys on the fears of the less-enlightened among us.  Driving wedges is his forte and he’s damn good at it.  And to have this guy serve as your de facto leader is a sorry situation indeed.

We can debate whether this is a master stroke by the media-obsessed Obama administration or if Limbaugh is winning the pissing contest by growing in clout and popularity.  But what is painfully obvious is that conservatives need a new leader and fresh ideas.  Beyond the ugliness of Limbaugh, going back to the “government is bad” default response simply ain’t gonna cut it, particularly when eight years of Bush spending renders useless any attempt to find religion when it comes to fiscal responsibility.  The party needs new, revolutionary ideas.  My advice?  Run an end-around on the Democrats by returning to the libertarian principles on which the party was founded – and promote the legalization of marijuana.  Think about how much sense that makes.  For one, it would help conservatives reconnect with the notion that the government should have no say on what people do with their bodies or their lives.  For all their invocation of Reagan, Republicans seemed to have forgotten that he once said, “I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism.”  At the core of libertarianism is the idea that one’s individual liberty should not be violated by the government (so long as they are not harming other people).  What better way to honor their long lost leader than to rediscover their conservative roots?

Economically, the argument is strengthened many times over.  Legalizing marijuana would help our struggling economy at a time when it needs it the most.  Now, I’m not a fan of taxes per se and I’m certainly no friend of government regulation (at least not the type we’ve been subjected to these past few years).  Nonetheless, taxing and regulating marijuana would work wonders for our country.  Not only would we raise plenty of money by taxing sales of pot (the grass is always greener!) but we’d also save billions of dollars (and untold lives) by taking the drug out of the hands of cartels and placing it in the hands of legitimate proprietors.  Our country wastes ridiculous sums of money fighting an impossible war on drugs and we spend an even more unnecessary amount of money imprisoning people caught enjoying (or distributing) the magic leaf.  Think about the opportunity cost associated with fighting that war.  Random tangent – did you know that China, with a population roughly 4x that of the U.S., has one million less prisoners than we do?  Interesting…

The fact that pot is illegal in the U.S. makes no sense whatsoever.  That we can smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol – both of which have deadly direct and indirect (second-hand) consequences – yet we can’t smoke pot – which isn’t known to lead to deaths of any sort – is one of the more asinine aspects of our legal system.  Just Google “leading causes of death in the U.S.” and you’ll see lists well-populated by issues associated with nicotene and alcohol.  It just makes sense.  It’ll make our country safer and will put us on better economic footing.  And it’ll help move conservatives closer to the center, which will signal a fresh start for the party and no doubt appeal to moderates of both persuasions.  Seems like a no-brainer to me.

Stupid Stubborn Stupid

One of my gripes about the political system in the U.S. is the power duopoly that exists – that is, Republicans and Democrats run pretty much everything.  And baked into their respective ideologies is a stubborn inflexibility that does plenty to alienate the independent among us.  For example, you’re either for gun control or against it.  You’re either pro-choice or pro-life.  You’re either for gay marriage or against it.  Not much in the way of middle ground, and certainly no room for those who might be pro-choice but against gun control.

Such ideological myopia can be expected from political parties seeking to stand for (and against) something.  That is, after all, how they appeal to and build their respective constituencies.  My gripe largely applies to the lack of options for those of us who can’t identify overwhelmingly with one party or the other.  But when it comes to religion, such obstinate manuevering pertaining to questions of belief and morality frustrates me to no end.  Despite a complete inability to know for certain that what they preach is the truth, most of the world’s religions are absolutely convinced that theirs is the one and only path to righteousness, making the completely ludicrous claim that their religion has a monopoly on the truth.  And what’s most disconcerting is that they practice their beliefs with such ferocity and unshakeable dedication that they often refuse to compromise, even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary (aka reason) or when posed with human situations where compassion would seem to overrule doctrine.  A recent example of this madness at work was the experience of a nine year-old Brazilian girl who had to undergo an abortion after being raped and impregnated – with twins – by her stepfather.   Despite the pregnancy posing a serious risk to the girl – all of 80 pounds – the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil objected to the procedure, saying that the girl should’ve carried the twins to term and had a Caesarean section because “It’s the law of God: do not kill.”  Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Matter Over Mind

My legs really hate my brain right now.  If there were a way to measure such things, my lower extremities would hold a grudge like no other.  The reason being I’ve been training for the Tokyo Marathon for about three months now, mostly consistently though I do confess to a bout of procrastination or two.  Actually, when it comes to stuff like this, I must say that I’ve been pretty damn good about sticking with this thing.

I’ve always been a pretty decent runner.  Never fast but always good with distance.  Indeed, I’ve run thousands of miles chasing balls around soccer fields and basketball courts during my life.  This, no doubt, has wreaked untold havoc on my feet, knees and lower back, each of which had done a brilliant job of hiding their distaste for me throughout most of my sporting life.  Like good soldiers, they took their orders and carried them out in honorable fashion, rarely questioning my instructions or rebelling in the form of excruciating pain.  Even when pushing them to their limits with ever-increasing distances as part of my training, they appeared to become the body’s manifestation of semper fidelis, wholeheartedly carrying out the mission of their misguided general despite harboring a deep skepticism about the grand plan.  Unfortunately, it would appear that I took this armistice for granted, for now all out war has been declared.  As fate often dictates, complacency ultimately gets its due.

Things were going pretty well for a while there.  After setting a solid foundation with a month or so of 5-8 mile runs, I began to work my way up to distances that would elicit responses of distorted facial expressions of “are you f*&king crazy?” when I told others what I had done earlier that day.  And my body was feeling pretty good, even though I would hit a wall of sorts once my distances eclipsed the ten-mile mark.  Upon reflection, I now realize that’s usually when the battles first began, once we crossed over into double digit territory.  It’s when my feet would cease feeling like extensions of my body and would more closely resemble blocks of cement clumsily attached to my ankles with barbwire.  My upper thighs would begin to move like they were being held back by huge rubber bands and my lower back would start to feel like the vertebrae had all collapsed on each other like a closed accordion.  That’s how the body rebels against the mind.  It either shuts down completely or starts to work in reverse, conspiring against whatever lunatic goal your mind has set its sights on.

The physical pain is just the beginning and seems to pass as a temporary, ethereal state of existence.  Somehow, you find a way to power through it, damned and determined to get in the miles you think you need that day as part of your training.  Once the endorphins kick in and you float your way to the finish, you look to melt into the nearest chair or couch.  But this is a dangerous proposition, for an attempt to rise from such comfort is met by a painful reminder of how betrayed your body feels by your latest machinations.  And so it’s the after-party that really sucks.  I’ve found that my ability to function as a normal human-being is impeded in a meaningful way on days when my runs eclipse double digits in mileage.  Beyond the aches and pains that go along with my joints screaming out for attention, my ability to decipher common vernacular is rendered useless.  My response times slow down, my hand-eye coordination is thrown way off, and my entire body feels tired in the strangest of ways, kind of like transferring the fatigue one feels in the eyelids after pulling an all-nighter to the entirety of one’s body.  Proud of myself for getting the run in, I’m left bittersweet by the notion that the balance of my day will be spent in a catatonic state.

Wise people often say that running, like most things in life, is best enjoyed in moderation.  By extrapolation, that would mean that marathons probably aren’t the best of ideas.  To that I would say humbug.  For no other reason besides stubborn pride, I have to check that box that says “marathon” on my list of things to accomplish before I die.  They also say that running on pavement is really bad for your legs, which bear the brunt of the energy transfer that occurs when two largely immovable objects (my legs) continuously pummel another even more immovable one (the concrete).  In order to spread out the force of each step, it is said that one should run on sand instead of pavement since it does a better job of absorbing and dispersing the power of each step.  To that I say there are no beaches in Tokyo.  And I must soldier on.

But I am no Marine with the intestinal fortitude to solider on.  Nor am I a monk who can meditate in the nude in the middle of snow-peaked mountains while “willing” a nearby rack of wet clothes to dry themselves.  For I am a failure in the department of mind over matter.  My body has rebelled in such a fashion that I must abandon my dream of completing the marathon, which pains me to have to write.  The reality is that, after months of punishment, my right leg is in a sorry state.  Usually around mile three, pain starts to emanate from the inside part of my right ankle before creeping up my shin around mile five and then settling into my knee at about mile eight.  After the runs my lower leg would absolutely kill.  And I could detect swelling around my shin along with some discoloration.  It could be shin splints or maybe even a small stress fracture.  I’ll never know because I decided against trying to navigate the Japanese medical system to figure it out.  My guess is that the doctor, after hours of exaggerated hand motions, tests and hundreds of dollars, would just tell me to give the leg a rest, which is exactly the same advice Lizzi gave me for free.  Whatever the injury is, I’ve cried uncle.  And by doing so, I’ve admitted that I’m too much of a wimp to run a marathon.  This has led to many sleepless nights.  Such failure does not rest well with the competitive among us.  Indeed, a part of my manhood was left by the gates of the Imperial Palace (where I would conduct my runs).

In the end, this is what a very dear friend of ours would call a “high SAT decision”.  There’s no sense in pushing one’s body beyond its limits just to check a stupid box, especially when doing so would likely have severe long-term implications.  And it’s worth noting that the marathon got its name from the legendary jaunt of Pheidippides from the greek city of Marathon to Athens, where he triumphantly announced that the Persians had been defeated by the Greeks in the Battle of Marathon.  And then he died from exhaustion.  Though he certainly ran with much more urgency than I ever would, I’m going to assume that the moral of that story is that humans should not run marathons.   And there’s my silver lining.

Orzag Revisited

I indicated in an earlier post that I was excited to hear from Obama’s budget guru, Peter Orzag, who by all accounts was an impressive individual.  Well, I heard him on the Rachel Maddow Show the other night and I must say that I was a bit taken aback.   I’m not passing judgment on the guy’s acumen or anything, but his voice was…..hmmm, how to describe….not what I expected.

What a miniature voice for such a prominent man!  Maddow’s voice was like three keys lower than Orzag’s (insert joke here).  It reminded me of this classic YouTube clip of a talk show host who loses it over the puny voice of one of his guests.

Slice Of Awesome

This is a great commercial.

Random Japan – Jobs Edition

dsc03474

The employment situation in Japan makes for fascinating study.  Basically, Japan is a socialist country in everything but name.  As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, China is substantially more capitalist than Japan (note we are referring here to economic systems rather than political ones), which would seem to run counter to conventional wisdom.  But I assure you that is indeed the case.  One of the ways that socialism manifests itself in Japan is on full display when one takes time to observe the workforce.  Looking around, it’s pretty easy to see that this is a country that is built on the ideal of full employment, which may not be evident in the official statistics but the situation on the ground seems to suggest otherwise (though the official unemployment rate in Japan has always been relatively low, particularly when compared to its industrialized counterparts).  Remember, this is the land of lifetime employment, where it is virtually unheard of for employees to be laid off or fired for cause.  Instead, underperformers are shuffled to other departments, and attempts to avoid layoffs lead to requests for older workers to take early retirement so companies can keep their younger (and cheaper) employees.

Now that we’ve laid the groundwork, let me move on to the point of this post.  Over the course of my two years here, it’s become abundantly clear that there are ridiculous amounts of jobs in Japan that serve very little purpose other than to fill another uniform and provide another paycheck.  I come across examples of this phenomenon virtually everyday, whether it’s seeing four floor workers at a clothing boutique the size of a bathtub or watching a team of three construction workers stand watch over the one colleague who is actually working.  Each time I witness something like this, I always think to myself about how much fun it would be to write about each occurrence as part of a new series of posts on random Japanese jobs.  So consider this the first post in what will no doubt evolve to become a wonderful series on all things wasteful and unproductive in Japan.

The above photo shows a construction worker “standing guard” outside of a worksite.  This is part of the Roppongi Hills complex where we live.  It’s got lots of shops and restaurants, mostly of the hoity toity variety (right above where this was shot is one of our favorite Italian restaurants, Il Mulino).  Obviously, the workers are renovating a shop that is hidden behind the elaborate board you see there in blue.  In addition to being completely blocked off to pedestrian traffic by the big blue cover, there are cones connected by rope to provide another (and totally unnecessary) level of security.  In case you are an absolute moron and can’t figure out that you are probably not supposed to wander into the worksite, there is a big sign right by the door warning outsiders against entry.  And just to make sure, they’ve got this little guy standing guard outside, hard hat and all.  You may be able to make out the little wand that he’s holding with his white gloves.  He uses that to usher along those who walk by him.  So if I were to just be walking by, with absolutely no intention of entering his workspace, he will go out of his way to point his wand in the direction that I’m walking while using his other arm to usher me along (without making contact).  Thanks, bud.  I would’ve been lost without you.  This is obviously a total and complete waste of time and money, yet you see people like this at every construction site in Tokyo.  Unbelievable.

The Big Idea

For those of you losing sleep at night wondering what it is that provides the graphic background in my blog title, wonder no more.  Below is the full picture, which I stumbled upon while perusing the net in search of something cool.  I’m not entirely sure what I meant to convey by including it in my title.  But that’s OK.  If Chris Martin of Coldplay can confess to not knowing what his song Yellow is all about, then I should be just fine.

1077320945_86f2d7d256

The Grape Lady

This is one of the greatest videos I’ve ever seen.  The noises this woman makes are downright amazing.

She even managed her own shoutout on The Family Guy.

And she got her own music video.

PostSecret

 PostSecret is an ongoing community art project where people mail in their secrets anonymously on one side of a postcard.  Pretty cool stuff. 

Maurice Clarett Says Not To Worry

Former Ohio State running back Maurice Clarett has been blogging from prison.  Sounds like the dude is doing OK, which is good to hear after following his rollercoaster  (and short) college and pro careers.  I love how he includes his full name in some of his posts.  “Maurice Clarett On Keeping It All In Perspective.”  Sounds like a Chuck Klosterman piece.

A Little Perspective

I came across a couple stories while reading the papers today that reminded me of how everything is relative in this world:

  • While we discuss humane logistics such as the payment of taxes and possible paths to citizenship for illegal aliens, Brunei recently revealed that it has flogged roughly 400 foreigners with rattan canes over the past five years for entering the oil-rich sultanate without valid travel documents or for overstaying their visas.
  • While we celebrate diversity with exemplary appointments to some of the highest offices in the land (president, secretary of state, and attorney general, to name a few), the president of Sudan is about to be the first head of state to be indicted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity related to atrocities committed against rival (non-Arab) tribes in Darfur.
  • Meanwhile, the president of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, is growing more strict with his Islamic code, condoning the murder of seven young women said to have “loose morals” who were “rightfully shot” by male relatives in honor killings.  He also said that women are the property of their husbands and that their only function is to bear children.  He also encourages men to take more than one wife.  I guess it’s better to diversify in the event you need to knock a couple off to preserve your honor.
  • In somewhat related news, girls in the Swat Valley of Pakistan, which has just been handed over to the Taliban, got the “good” news yesterday that they would be allowed to attend school, so long as they wear scarves and veils that cover their faces.  Awfully nice of those Taliban guys, no?
  • And while we lament the precipitous decline of our life savings, at least we don’t have to worry about being devoured by wild tigers, a fate that three Indonesian villagers met last week.

Sometimes a little perspective can help bring this world and our own personal travails into finer focus.

He’s At It Again!

Amazingly, Bill O’Reilly continues his hypocritical crusade against Jeff Immelt and GE.  (Disclaimer – I have no opinion whatsoever on Immelt or GE; however, I do enjoy tackling the walking contradictions that tend to dominate big media these days).  On yesterday’s show, O’Reilly let Immelt have it for his decision to slash GE’s dividend for the first time in 71 years, basically going so far as to suggest that the guy should be prosecuted for crimes against his shareholders.  As part of his rant, O’Reilly pointed to the stock’s precipitous decline as an affront to the investing public, particularly in light of the fact that Immelt earns “$20 million” in salary while his company’s shareholders take a bath.

Naturally, this got me thinking again about the wonderful world of hypocrisy in which O’Reilly lives.  Keeping up with his many leaps in logic is becoming an increasingly difficult feat, mind you.  But I do try my best, so here goes.  First of all, GE’s stock has declined 75.5% over the past twelve months (through March 2nd).  Granted, that’s a brutal result, but it’s not too far from the 71.2% decline in the share price of News Corp. (the parent company of O’Reilly’s Fox News Channel).  In case you didn’t read my earlier post on the topic, recall that GE actually outperformed News Corp. by just over 1% during 2008 (-54.0% vs. -55.3%).  Second, even after the cut that O’Reilly considers so offensive, GE’s dividend yield (5.3%) is still more than double that of News Corp. (2.3%).  And finally, O’Reilly totally sacrifices whatever moral superiority he managed to muster when he ventures into the area of executive compensation.  For starters, the $20 million that O’Reilly initially mentioned is factually incorrect.  Per Bloomberg, Immelt earned $14.1 million in total compensation during 2008, which included $3.3 million in salary, $6.9 million in stock awards and $3.6 million in pension/nonqualified deffered comp (which shouldn’t really count).  By comparison, Murdoch earned $27.5 million in total compensation during 2008, which included $8.1 million in salary, $1.5 million in stock awards and $17.5 million in non-equity incentives.

So let’s break that down.  Murdoch outearned Immelt by a multiple of two despite turning in a roughly similar performance last year.  And his base salary was double Immelt’s while his compensation tied to the performance of his company’s stock (stock awards/equity incentives) was at a level 80% lower than his GE counterpart (notice the bulk of Murdoch’s compensation came in the form of non-equity incentives).  To the skeptical observer, this would seem to suggest that Murdoch isn’t all that high on his company’s stock.  But has he actually gone even further to unload some of his News Corp. stock while it cratered?  Indeed he has.  Since December 2007, Murdoch has been a net seller of News Corp. shares (2.5 million of them, to be exact).  Meanwhile, Immelt has been a net buyer of his company’s shares, even as they fell off a cliff.  In fact, the guy hasn’t initiated one sell order in the open market since the world began its meltdown back in the summer of 2007.  The dude even bought another 50,000 shares yesterday, just as the stock began to head below $8/share for the first time since 1994!  Hmmm….

But the compensation versus performance comparison gets even better.  Judging by what I could gather from Bloomberg, it appears that Murdoch earned a total of $82.3 million during the period 2004-2008.  By comparison, Immelt earned $32.2 million.  During that time, News Corp. and GE stock declined 63.9% and 70.3%, respectively.  Not much of a difference, in my view.  Certainly not enough to justify Murdoch being compensated at a level 2.6x that of Immelt, that’s for damn sure!

Fed up, I decided to email O’Reilly’s show to give him the business.  Knowing his preference for ”pithy” comments and fancy words, I sent along the following:

Your treatment of Immelt is far from fair and balanced, particularly if you were to compare GE’s performance to your own News Corp.  Enough with the sophistry!

We’ll see if O’Reilly has the balls to take on his own boss!

Japan’s Crisis Of The Mind

There was a fantastic piece by Masaru Tamamoto of the World Policy Institute in today’s IHT.   It perfectly captured that strange mix of forboding, risk aversion, and complacency that has come to define Japan for me. 

But what most people don’t recognize is that our crisis is not political, but psychological. After our aggression – and subsequent defeat – in World War II, safety and predictability became society’s goals. Bureaucrats rose to control the details of everyday life. We became a nation with lifetime employment, a corporate system based on stable cross-holdings of shares, and a large middle-class population in which people are equal and alike…

…Japan desperately needs change, and this will require risk. Risk-taking is not common among the bureaucratically controlled. You won’t find many signs on Japanese beaches saying, “Swim at your own risk. No lifeguard on duty.” If that sign were to appear, many Japanese would likely ask the authorities to tell them if it is safe to swim. 

Is This Thing On?

Not only was Bobby Jindal’s speech the other night horribly-executed (didn’t it sound like his delivery was designed to mimic a parent telling their child a story before bed?), but we’ve now learned that the dude told a bold-faced lie.  This is something that I simply cannot get my head around.  Sure, each of us has struggled with the truth to varying degrees throughout our sin-filled lives.  But why in the world would anyone knowingly lie about something while they’re on camera?  It’s like watching The Real World on MTV and seeing someone lie to their roommates about something they did earlier in the episode when the cameras were clearly rolling.  Don’t they know that their bluff will eventually be called once the show airs?  Apparently not, because we are inevitably treated to multiple such lapses throughout the course of every season.  What are these people thinking?  That the cameras weren’t on?  And that the editing team wouldn’t jump at the chance to splice the film together to reveal the little rascals for the liars they truly are?  Come on!

And what’s amazing about Jindal’s little run-in with honesty was that he had to know the media would be analyzing every single thing he said, all the while licking their chops in search of something – anything – that could paint the governor and his party in an embarrassing light.  And there he went serving a fastball down the middle.  Boggles my mind that people in the public eye could be so dumb.

Slice Of Awesome

Pineapple Express

2874226906_cb9d851e85

On the advice of a good friend, Lizzi and I watched Pineapple Express today.  If my math is correct, this movie marked the fourth collaboration between Seth Rogen and Judd Apatow (after 40 Year-Old Virgin, Superbad and Knocked Up).  Having taken in each of the aforementioned movies, I can make the informed statement that these guys score a big, fat mediocre in my book (2-2 to be exact).  I liked Virgin and Knocked Up but didn’t love them.  They were really funny in spots, thanks to great dialogue and perfect delivery, but comic materpieces they were not (which makes me long for the days of Dumb & Dumber).  Conversely, I found Superbad and Pineapple to be absolutely atrocious.  Both movies tried way too hard and failed miserably in the comedy department.  On top of not being funny in the slightest, Pineapple was totally random in an incoherent and haphazard kind of way.  Lots of over-the-top screaming and yelling combined with moments of gratuitous violence that would’ve been cool if Tarantino were behind the camera…but he wasn’t, so it wasn’t even remotely cool.  It almost felt like an amateur film school production where the students creating the movie couldn’t stop giggling at the thought of making a film about pot that allowed them to play with fake blood and big explosions.  Totally lame.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.